Belief and Interpretation: Meditations on Pelikan's "Interpreting the Bible and the Constitution"

Is belief a prerequisite of interpretation? Can we interpret a document if we do not believe that it has something to say to us, if we do not anticipate that we can learn from the text? Jaroslav Pelikan's assessment of the similarities and differences in constitutional and Biblical hermeneutics...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mootz, Francis J., III 1961- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2006
In: Journal of law and religion
Year: 2006, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 385-399
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822366135
003 DE-627
005 20221114172120.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221114s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S074808140000566X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822366135 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822366135 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)135632862  |0 (DE-627)569000130  |0 (DE-576)262169681  |4 aut  |a Mootz, Francis J.  |c III  |d 1961- 
109 |a Mootz, Francis J. III 1961-  |a Mootz, Francis J. 1961-  |a Mootz, Jay 1961- 
245 1 0 |a Belief and Interpretation  |b Meditations on Pelikan's "Interpreting the Bible and the Constitution" 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Is belief a prerequisite of interpretation? Can we interpret a document if we do not believe that it has something to say to us, if we do not anticipate that we can learn from the text? Jaroslav Pelikan's assessment of the similarities and differences in constitutional and Biblical hermeneutics does not raise this question expressly, but his eloquent description of how the faithful struggle to remain true to their guiding texts inexorably leads one to question the role of belief. In this essay, I first acknowledge the unavoidable significance of belief in the elaboration of a textual tradition. Then, I argue that rhetorical and hermeneutical principles clarify the distinction between a faithful interpretation rooted in belief and the inauthentic manipulation of a text for strategic goals.Belief fosters commitment to the text, which legitimizes and authenticates an interpreter's efforts. We readily distinguish the constitutive exegetical rhetoric that girds social life from the "mere" rhetoric employed by sophistic interpreters, characterizing the former as a vital and productive development of a tradition and the latter as a corruption of the tradition. Pelikan claims that his goal is to formulate a general methodology of faithful interpretation, but his reflections confirm that there can be no neat methodological distinction between a legitimate reading rooted in belief on one hand, and a strategic manipulation of a text designed to undermine the cause for belief on the other. Making this distinction requires a judgment that can be rhetorically defended but never methodologically justified; the faithful may prove themselves only in the "dangerous maybe" of debate and persuasion. As Gene Garver has argued, Aristotle's great advance was to show that rhetoric is an art of character and not just a matter of logic. I would add that there can be no methodology of interpretation because there can be no methodology for developing one's character. 
601 |a Interpretation 
601 |a Pelikane 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of law and religion  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983  |g 21(2006), 2, Seite 385-399  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)461908581  |w (DE-600)2164472-X  |w (DE-576)273875132  |x 2163-3088  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2006  |g number:2  |g pages:385-399 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S074808140000566X  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/belief-and-interpretation-meditations-on-pelikans-interpreting-the-bible-and-the-constitution/C31D629A6122AFDA7176AFE982AA1A4D  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4210420190 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822366135 
LOK |0 005 20221114165256 
LOK |0 008 221114||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL