Rawls's Dangerous Idea?: Liberalism, Evolution and the Legal Requirement of Religious Neutrality in Public Schools
Since the mid-1990s the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools has acquired new life, largely as a result of a new generation of critics of evolution. In comparison to their predecessors, today's critics are better credentialed, have published works with respected academic and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2005
|
| In: |
Journal of law and religion
Year: 2005, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 423-458 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1822369088 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221114175225.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221114s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/4144670 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1822369088 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822369088 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)171784804 |0 (DE-627)06202857X |0 (DE-576)16610423X |4 aut |a Beckwith, Francis |d 1960- | |
| 109 | |a Beckwith, Francis 1960- |a Beckwith, Francis J. 1960- |a Beckwith, Francis Joseph 1960- |a Beckwith, Frank 1960- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rawls's Dangerous Idea? |b Liberalism, Evolution and the Legal Requirement of Religious Neutrality in Public Schools |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Since the mid-1990s the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools has acquired new life, largely as a result of a new generation of critics of evolution. In comparison to their predecessors, today's critics are better credentialed, have published works with respected academic and university presses and periodicals including peer-reviewed ones, and offer much more sophisticated arguments. The purpose of this essay, however, is not to engage the scientific merits of the arguments offered by these maverick scholars. Rather, the purpose of this essay is to explore a problem of jurisprudence, raised by philosopher Alvin Plantinga and responded to by philosopher of science Robert T. Pennock, whose resolution has relevance to the constitutional question of whether the teaching of evolution along with the works of its critics is permissible in a society whose citizens embrace contrary philosophical and religious points of view. | ||
| 601 | |a Public School | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of law and religion |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983 |g 20(2005), 2, Seite 423-458 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)461908581 |w (DE-600)2164472-X |w (DE-576)273875132 |x 2163-3088 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2005 |g number:2 |g pages:423-458 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/4144670 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/rawlss-dangerous-idea-liberalism-evolution-and-the-legal-requirement-of-religious-neutrality-in-public-schools/4A2817312613B9BDF5C1901C17590421 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4210425117 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1822369088 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221114174013 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221114||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
