On Parenesis and Fundamental Moral Theology

Recently, Roman Catholic moral theologians, in particular Schüller and McCormick, have stressed the difference between, and the perils of confusing, normative ethics with hortatory moralizing, or "parenesis." This viewpoint has lately been directed to criticizing certain conceptions of the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaffney, James (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 1983
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 1983, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 23-34
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822380103
003 DE-627
005 20221115052616.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1822380103 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822380103 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gaffney, James  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Gaffney, James 
245 1 0 |a On Parenesis and Fundamental Moral Theology 
264 1 |c 1983 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recently, Roman Catholic moral theologians, in particular Schüller and McCormick, have stressed the difference between, and the perils of confusing, normative ethics with hortatory moralizing, or "parenesis." This viewpoint has lately been directed to criticizing certain conceptions of the distinctiveness of Christian ethics, including Hauerwas's emphasis on the importance of character in the context of narrative for exhibiting the validity of Christian morality. It is here argued that the distinction between parenesis and ethical norms, although meaningful, has been too sharply drawn and too extensively applied. It is suggested that a more discreet use of the distinction would reveal greater scope for positions like Hauerwas's and take better advantage of modern developments in metaethics. 
601 |a Fundament 
601 |a Theologe 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 11(1983), 1, Seite 23-34  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:1983  |g number:1  |g pages:23-34 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1642675725  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/40014955  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211023489 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822380103 
LOK |0 005 20221115052616 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-04#B3A3D1A7A95ED12EA3D7B55AD5244DB097994C2C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL