Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason

In response to criticisms of his "Ambiguity in Moral Choice", Richard McCormick developed, in "Commentary on the Commentaries," an alternative view on proportionate reason. I interpret McCormick's view in terms of what I call "the undermining principle," "the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Levy, Sanford S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 1985
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 1985, Volume: 13, Issue: 2, Pages: 258-278
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822380685
003 DE-627
005 20221115052617.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s1985 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1822380685 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822380685 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Levy, Sanford S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Levy, Sanford S.  |a Levy, Sanford 
245 1 0 |a Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason 
264 1 |c 1985 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In response to criticisms of his "Ambiguity in Moral Choice", Richard McCormick developed, in "Commentary on the Commentaries," an alternative view on proportionate reason. I interpret McCormick's view in terms of what I call "the undermining principle," "the theory of associated goods," "the necessity principle," and "the liberty principle." I argue that the first two are the heart of the theory and link McCormick's view to that of Peter Knauer. I then show that McCormick's view suffers from several problems, including a lack of argumentation for his central undermining principle, and counterexamples to his necessity and liberty principles. 
601 |a Richard 
601 |a McCormick, Richard A. 
601 |a Proportion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 13(1985), 2, Seite 258-278  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:1985  |g number:2  |g pages:258-278 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1644456885  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/40015013  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 421102406X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822380685 
LOK |0 005 20221115052617 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-04#74FF35BF7908C609E45E7FA43E0A1F2541DC3703 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL