Assessing an Assessment: A Response to Ronald M. Green's Review of the "Journal of Religious Ethics"
The author considers the achievements of the Journal of Religious Ethics against a larger history of philosophical theology and comparative religious studies, suggesting the wisdom of modesty and raising the possibility that contemporary academic inquiry in religious ethics is actually less rich and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
1997
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 1997, Volume: 25, Issue: 3, Pages: 275-279 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The author considers the achievements of the Journal of Religious Ethics against a larger history of philosophical theology and comparative religious studies, suggesting the wisdom of modesty and raising the possibility that contemporary academic inquiry in religious ethics is actually less rich and less supple than is suggested in Green's review. Of particular concern are unproductive nondialogues between philosophical secularists and confessional "narrativists," present tendencies toward anti-institutional ab- straction, the contemporary overvaluation of suspicion and critique, and a pervasive anti theological bias. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|