Can a Pacifist Have a Conversation with Augustine? A Response to Alain Epp Weaver

Christians have historically differed as to whether the wrongness of an act is to be located in the objective character of the act or in the intention of the agent. By blurring this distinction, Alain Epp Weaver fails to see the real principle of consistency that unites Augustine's analyses of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, James Turner (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2001
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2001, Volume: 29, Issue: 1, Pages: 87-93
Further subjects:B objective evil
B Killing
B Augustine
B lies
B Intention
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 182238432X
003 DE-627
005 20221115052624.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/0384-9694.00069  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)182238432X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP182238432X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Johnson, James Turner  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Can a Pacifist Have a Conversation with Augustine? A Response to Alain Epp Weaver 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Christians have historically differed as to whether the wrongness of an act is to be located in the objective character of the act or in the intention of the agent. By blurring this distinction, Alain Epp Weaver fails to see the real principle of consistency that unites Augustine's analyses of warfare and lying. Likewise, by not appreciating the fact that Augustine analyzes the wrongness of the act in terms of intention whereas Yoder analyzes its wrongness in terms of its objective character, Weaver proposes a conversation between two figures who lack the framework of shared assumptions that makes engagement in conversation possible. 
601 |a Conversano 
601 |a Augustiner 
650 4 |a objective evil 
650 4 |a Killing 
650 4 |a lies 
650 4 |a Intention 
650 4 |a Augustine 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 29(2001), 1, Seite 87-93  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2001  |g number:1  |g pages:87-93 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)596892748  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017878  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0384-9694.00069  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0384-9694.00069  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211027700 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 182238432X 
LOK |0 005 20221115052624 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#F2D04C8D16912AF7EA199FD6C5B7209ED5F709BF 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017878 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Intention 
STB 0 0 |a Intention 
STC 0 0 |a Intención 
STD 0 0 |a Intenzione 
STE 0 0 |a 意图,打算,意向 
STF 0 0 |a 意圖,打算,意向 
STG 0 0 |a Intenção 
STH 0 0 |a Намерение 
STI 0 0 |a Πρόθεση 
SUB |a REL 

Similar Items

more