Passion and Reason: Aristotelian Strategies in Kierkegaard’s Ethics

Both Aristotle and Kierkegaard show that virtues result, in part, from training which produces distinctive patterns of salience. The “frame problem” in AI shows that rationality requires salience. Salience is a function of cares and desires (passions) and thus governs choice in much the way Aristotl...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lillegard, Norman (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2002
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2002, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 251-273
Further subjects:B Rationality
B Salience
B Kierkegaard
B Virtue
B Aristotle
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822384664
003 DE-627
005 20221115052624.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1467-9795.00106  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822384664 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822384664 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lillegard, Norman  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Passion and Reason: Aristotelian Strategies in Kierkegaard’s Ethics 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Both Aristotle and Kierkegaard show that virtues result, in part, from training which produces distinctive patterns of salience. The “frame problem” in AI shows that rationality requires salience. Salience is a function of cares and desires (passions) and thus governs choice in much the way Aristotle supposes when he describes choice as deliberative desire. Since rationality requires salience it follows that rationality requires passion. Thus Kierkegaard is no more an irrationalist in ethics than is Aristotle, though he continues to be charged with irrationalism. The compatibility of an Aristotelian reading of Kierkegaard with the “suspension of the ethical” and general problems with aretaic ethical theories are treated briefly. The author argues that it is possible to preserve a realist ethics in the face of the “tradition relativism” which threatens the version of virtue ethics here attributed to Kierkegaard. 
601 |a Passionar 
601 |a Strategie 
650 4 |a Salience 
650 4 |a Virtue 
650 4 |a Rationality 
650 4 |a Kierkegaard 
650 4 |a Aristotle 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 30(2002), 2, Seite 251-273  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2002  |g number:2  |g pages:251-273 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018082  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9795.00106  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9795.00106  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211028049 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822384664 
LOK |0 005 20221115052624 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#EF9C682473CE6ED3293ADF18F5EFD70331A0D9D1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018082 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL