Passion and Reason: Aristotelian Strategies in Kierkegaard’s Ethics
Both Aristotle and Kierkegaard show that virtues result, in part, from training which produces distinctive patterns of salience. The “frame problem” in AI shows that rationality requires salience. Salience is a function of cares and desires (passions) and thus governs choice in much the way Aristotl...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2002
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2002, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 251-273 |
Further subjects: | B
Rationality
B Salience B Kierkegaard B Virtue B Aristotle |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1822384664 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115052624.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1467-9795.00106 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1822384664 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822384664 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lillegard, Norman |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Passion and Reason: Aristotelian Strategies in Kierkegaard’s Ethics |
264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Both Aristotle and Kierkegaard show that virtues result, in part, from training which produces distinctive patterns of salience. The “frame problem” in AI shows that rationality requires salience. Salience is a function of cares and desires (passions) and thus governs choice in much the way Aristotle supposes when he describes choice as deliberative desire. Since rationality requires salience it follows that rationality requires passion. Thus Kierkegaard is no more an irrationalist in ethics than is Aristotle, though he continues to be charged with irrationalism. The compatibility of an Aristotelian reading of Kierkegaard with the “suspension of the ethical” and general problems with aretaic ethical theories are treated briefly. The author argues that it is possible to preserve a realist ethics in the face of the “tradition relativism” which threatens the version of virtue ethics here attributed to Kierkegaard. | ||
601 | |a Passionar | ||
601 | |a Strategie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Salience | |
650 | 4 | |a Virtue | |
650 | 4 | |a Rationality | |
650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
650 | 4 | |a Aristotle | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 30(2002), 2, Seite 251-273 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2002 |g number:2 |g pages:251-273 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018082 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9795.00106 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9795.00106 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211028049 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1822384664 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115052624 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#EF9C682473CE6ED3293ADF18F5EFD70331A0D9D1 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018082 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |