Reinhold Niebuhr's Paradox: Groundwork for Social Responsibility

This paper is an examination of Reinhold Niebuhr's embrace of the paradoxical in relation to his conception of the self. While it explores the theoretical and practical difficulties entailed in Niebuhr's account, it also seeks to defend his position, suggesting that in the light of Niebuhr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malotky, Daniel James (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2003
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2003, Volume: 31, Issue: 1, Pages: 121-123
Further subjects:B Paradox
B Epistemology
B Pragmatism
B Self
B Freedom
B Reinhold Niebuhr
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 182238480X
003 DE-627
005 20221115052624.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1467-9795.00124  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)182238480X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP182238480X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Malotky, Daniel James  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Malotky, Daniel James  |a Malotky, Daniel  |a Malotky, Daniel J. 
245 1 0 |a Reinhold Niebuhr's Paradox: Groundwork for Social Responsibility 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper is an examination of Reinhold Niebuhr's embrace of the paradoxical in relation to his conception of the self. While it explores the theoretical and practical difficulties entailed in Niebuhr's account, it also seeks to defend his position, suggesting that in the light of Niebuhr's negative apologetic, the paradoxical self represents the only intelligible means of self–understanding available. Though Niebuhr never develops this epistemological ground, it may provide a way of avoiding the moral consequentialism to which Niebuhr appears to be resigned. The resulting framework points toward moral pragmatism, retaining its orientation and relevance in the midst of deliberations concerning means and ends. 
601 |a Niebuhr, Reinhold 
650 4 |a Self 
650 4 |a Reinhold Niebuhr 
650 4 |a Pragmatism 
650 4 |a Paradox 
650 4 |a Freedom 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 31(2003), 1, Seite 121-123  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2003  |g number:1  |g pages:121-123 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1644319403  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9795.00124  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9795.00124  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211028189 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 182238480X 
LOK |0 005 20221115052624 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#FF65CB2F2FE99C4DD9B7F0D89B7D4C9B5BB0BBB0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL