THE MISFORTUNE OF THE HAPPY

Levinas himself raises the question: “why would I feel responsible in the presence of the Face” since “we are separate ontological beings?” This questions the character of our response to the other—both in terms of agency and motivation. While the general reception of Levinas's thought has focu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ferreira, M. Jamie (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2006
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2006, Volume: 34, Issue: 3, Pages: 461-483
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Generosity
B Motivation
B Desire
B Levinas
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822385822
003 DE-627
005 20221115052626.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00278.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822385822 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822385822 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ferreira, M. Jamie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Ferreira, M. Jamie  |a Ferreira, M. J.  |a Ferreira, M. 
245 1 0 |a THE MISFORTUNE OF THE HAPPY 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Levinas himself raises the question: “why would I feel responsible in the presence of the Face” since “we are separate ontological beings?” This questions the character of our response to the other—both in terms of agency and motivation. While the general reception of Levinas's thought has focused on his description of us as “hostage”—that is, on the moment of assignation (or assignment) by the other—I suggest that Levinas himself also, though not as directly, addresses (as he needs to) the correlative moment, the moment of response. My essay reconstructs Levinas's implicit understanding of the character of our initiative in the light of his concept of Desire. I explore the different dimensions of Desire as appetite and generosity, and I argue that the “transition to moral consciousness” that Levinas wants to “justify” is one from complacent happiness to “non-complacent happiness” and can be illuminated by the notion of “passion seeking its downfall.” 
650 4 |a Generosity 
650 4 |a Motivation 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Desire 
650 4 |a Levinas 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 34(2006), 3, Seite 461-483  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2006  |g number:3  |g pages:461-483 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017697  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00278.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00278.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211029207 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822385822 
LOK |0 005 20221115052626 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#35B077E6426A50D9DE6F028AA4E699DB5B907789 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017697 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Motivation 
STB 0 0 |a Motivation 
STC 0 0 |a Motivación 
STD 0 0 |a Motivazione 
STE 0 0 |a 动力,动机,诱因 
STF 0 0 |a 動力,動機,誘因 
STG 0 0 |a Motivação 
STH 0 0 |a Мотивация 
STI 0 0 |a Κίνητρο 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Motiv,Verhalten,Verhaltensmotivation,Selbstmotivation,Selbstmotivierung