CONTEMPORARY MUFTIS BETWEEN BIOETHICS AND SOCIAL REALITY
Selecting the sex of a fetus has been a desire of parents in many different cultures. Modern Muslim religious scholars have identified advantages and disadvantages of this practice, permitting it in certain cases while forbidding it in others. In general, they do not appear to desire that selection...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2008
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 36, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-76 |
Further subjects: | B
Fatwas
B Ibn Sina B Procreation B sex screening B Infanticide B sex selection |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1822386276 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115052627.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00336.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1822386276 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822386276 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rispler-Chaim, Vardit |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a CONTEMPORARY MUFTIS BETWEEN BIOETHICS AND SOCIAL REALITY |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Selecting the sex of a fetus has been a desire of parents in many different cultures. Modern Muslim religious scholars have identified advantages and disadvantages of this practice, permitting it in certain cases while forbidding it in others. In general, they do not appear to desire that selection of sex become a common practice, yet they are willing to allow it for personal reasons. This case-by-case approach exemplifies a key aspect of Muslim ethical discourse. After an overview of justifications for fetal sex selection in different cultures, I turn to a discussion of authoritative Islamic sources. I then analyze the reasoning of several modern authorities who deal with the issue. In the absence of a clear religious text on the subject, scholars seem inclined to legitimize sex selection, and in so doing they appear strongly influenced by social attitudes. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Ibn Sina | |
650 | 4 | |a Procreation | |
650 | 4 | |a Fatwas | |
650 | 4 | |a sex screening | |
650 | 4 | |a Infanticide | |
650 | 4 | |a sex selection | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 36(2008), 1, Seite 53-76 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2008 |g number:1 |g pages:53-76 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40014878 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00336.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00336.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211029657 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1822386276 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115052627 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#3AC7FBCF88B69919888661862A10FF45FEA9E64A | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40014878 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |