THE UNIVERSAL VERSUS THE PARTICULAR IN ECOFEMINIST ETHICS
While not a monolithic movement, ecofeminists are united in their conviction that there are important connections between the exploitation of both women and nature. They are internally divided, however, on the propriety of applying their theoretical claims and activist strategies across social conte...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2010
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2010, Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 616-637 |
| Further subjects: | B
Context
B ecomaternalism B Essentialism B Appropriation B Universalism B earthcare B Ecofeminism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1822387205 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221115052628.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221115s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00455.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1822387205 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822387205 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kao, Grace Y. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a THE UNIVERSAL VERSUS THE PARTICULAR IN ECOFEMINIST ETHICS |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a While not a monolithic movement, ecofeminists are united in their conviction that there are important connections between the exploitation of both women and nature. They are internally divided, however, on the propriety of applying their theoretical claims and activist strategies across social contexts. This paper explores three debates within ecofeminism that largely turn on this universalist versus particularist tension: whether ecofeminist theorizing can adequately account for cultural variation; whether its common usage of essentialist rhetoric is productive or troubling; and whether resources for social activism could legitimately be culled from an assembly of heterogeneous and foreign sources. I conclude that the universalism of the women–nature connection can indeed be justified if perceived in multivalent ways, that “earthcare” or “ecomaternalist” discourse can be helpful in some contexts but harmful in others, and that selective retrieval of other cultures for the purposes of advocacy should not be ruled out as necessarily imperialistic or otherwise inappropriate. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Universalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Essentialism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a earthcare | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ecomaternalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ecofeminism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Context | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Appropriation | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 38(2010), 4, Seite 616-637 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2010 |g number:4 |g pages:616-637 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646569784 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40925926 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00455.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00455.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 38 |j 2010 |e 4 |h 616-637 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4211030582 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1822387205 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221115052628 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#F7FA5F24EBB4319A414A42C19FBBAA3EE3AD253E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40925926 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||