The Neo-Barthian Critique of Reinhold Niebuhr
The author notes an unclarity in David Novak's defense of Reinhold Niebuhr against Stanley Hauerwas's critique and identifies some issues left unsettled in the exchange between Novak and Hauerwas over Niebuhr's ethics. Specifically, the author proposes that the Barthian-Hauerwasian co...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2013
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 41, Issue: 3, Pages: 541-547 |
Further subjects: | B
Barmen Declaration
B Communitarianism B christocentric ethics B Reinhold Niebuhr B Nihilism B David Novak B Liberal Theology B Karl Barth B Stanley Hauerwas B Natural Law B Relativism B Natural Theology B ethical particularism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1822388236 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115052629.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12028 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1822388236 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822388236 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Santurri, Edmund N. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Neo-Barthian Critique of Reinhold Niebuhr |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The author notes an unclarity in David Novak's defense of Reinhold Niebuhr against Stanley Hauerwas's critique and identifies some issues left unsettled in the exchange between Novak and Hauerwas over Niebuhr's ethics. Specifically, the author proposes that the Barthian-Hauerwasian communitarian rejection of Niebuhrian natural theology and natural law ignores the historical abuse of biblical theology in the German Christian response to the Nazis, fails to account for the fact of general moral revulsion against Nazism, and flirts itself with a conventionalist form of nihilism. | ||
601 | |a Niebuhr, Reinhold | ||
650 | 4 | |a Barmen Declaration | |
650 | 4 | |a christocentric ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a ethical particularism | |
650 | 4 | |a Communitarianism | |
650 | 4 | |a Relativism | |
650 | 4 | |a Nihilism | |
650 | 4 | |a Liberal Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Natural Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Natural Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Karl Barth | |
650 | 4 | |a David Novak | |
650 | 4 | |a Stanley Hauerwas | |
650 | 4 | |a Reinhold Niebuhr | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 41(2013), 3, Seite 541-547 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2013 |g number:3 |g pages:541-547 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12028 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12028 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211031619 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1822388236 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115052629 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#7F7FC26DFC0B80259346100672F7C43D1939BC85 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |