After MacIntyre

In his influential book After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre identifies Kierkegaard's view of ethics with that of Kant. Both Kant and Kierkegaard, according to MacIntyre, accept the modern paradigm of moral activity for which freedom of the will is the ultimate basis. Ronald M. Green, in Kierkegaar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Humbert, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2014
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Issue: 2, Pages: 310-333
Further subjects:B Free Will
B Alasdair MacIntyre
B classical virtue
B Kierkegaard
B Autonomy
B Kant
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1822388503
003 DE-627
005 20250325025905.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jore.12058  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822388503 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822388503 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1100694994  |0 (DE-627)859499014  |0 (DE-576)420803289  |4 aut  |a Humbert, David 
109 |a Humbert, David 
245 1 0 |a After MacIntyre 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In his influential book After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre identifies Kierkegaard's view of ethics with that of Kant. Both Kant and Kierkegaard, according to MacIntyre, accept the modern paradigm of moral activity for which freedom of the will is the ultimate basis. Ronald M. Green, in Kierkegaard and Kant: The Hidden Debt, accepts and deepens this alignment between the two thinkers. Green argues that Kierkegaard deliberately obscured his debt to Kant by a systematic “misattribution” of his ideas to other thinkers, and to classical philosophy in particular. This essay argues that MacIntyre and Green are mistaken in identifying Kierkegaard with the Kantian tradition of moral autonomy and that they overlook his debt to the classical conception of virtue. In casting Kierkegaard in the role of the quintessential exponent of a modern conception of freedom, they have perhaps overlooked one of the greatest critics of moral autonomy who has ever lived. 
650 4 |a Free Will 
650 4 |a classical virtue 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
650 4 |a Alasdair MacIntyre 
650 4 |a Kant 
650 4 |a Kierkegaard 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 42(2014), 2, Seite 310-333  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:310-333 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586143  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12058  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12058  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
883 |8 1  |a cgwrk  |d 20250301  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211031880 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822388503 
LOK |0 005 20221115052630 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-03#9CC650273CE4DC6DA6B84292B7488A2F520EF27A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586143 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL