Sociological Controversies in Perspective

The historian of political science Quentin Skinner argues that it is not possible to understand correctly the meaning of a text if one ignores the intentions of its author. This approach is useful not only in the understanding of historical texts, but also for the interpretation of present writings....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tschannen, Oliver (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publications 1994
In: Review of religious research
Year: 1994, Volume: 36, Issue: 1, Pages: 70-86
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1822409667
003 DE-627
005 20221115052711.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221115s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3511653  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1822409667 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1822409667 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tschannen, Oliver  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sociological Controversies in Perspective 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The historian of political science Quentin Skinner argues that it is not possible to understand correctly the meaning of a text if one ignores the intentions of its author. This approach is useful not only in the understanding of historical texts, but also for the interpretation of present writings. The dispute over secularization that has raged in the '60s and '70s, and still lingers on, is a case in point. By taking into account the very divergent interests and intentions that lie behind the antagonists' contributions, one can understand several puzzling characteristics of this dispute. First and foremost, one can understand why it often remains at the level of a sterile confrontation of people arguing past each other instead of taking the form of an enlightening intellectual debate, and why, terminological differences put aside, the arguments of the critics of the secularization thesis are in fact so similar to those of the proponents of this very thesis. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Review of religious research  |d London : Sage Publications, 1959  |g 36(1994), 1, Seite 70-86  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)362776326  |w (DE-600)2100833-4  |w (DE-576)257192638  |x 2211-4866  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:1994  |g number:1  |g pages:70-86 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3511653  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/3511653  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4211053043 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1822409667 
LOK |0 005 20221115052711 
LOK |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-29#494A417847F4FDC2E83378DD16D7343DD6235535 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL