Covering Conventional and Unconventional Religion: A Reporter's View

Critics of news coverage should probably know that these days one would hardly hear an editor shout "Stop the presses!" to some dungeon deep in the bowels of the "Daily Bugle" just to grab a sensational headline. The anachronistic image dates from at least mid-century when many l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Dart, John (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Springer 1997
In: Review of religious research
Jahr: 1997, Band: 39, Heft: 2, Seiten: 144-152
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallele Ausgabe:Nicht-Elektronisch
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Critics of news coverage should probably know that these days one would hardly hear an editor shout "Stop the presses!" to some dungeon deep in the bowels of the "Daily Bugle" just to grab a sensational headline. The anachronistic image dates from at least mid-century when many large cities had several newspapers with multiple editions, each competing for streetcorner attention and vying to scoop the opposition. For various social and economic reasons -- suburban sprawl, increased commuter travel, production and distribution costs, vast improvements in electronic communications, corporate mergers and buyouts -- the major cities now have one or two newspapers and different kinds of competitors in television news and suburban papers. Yet this is precisely one of the explanations offered for media bias (sensationalism driven by profit motive) in the paper by Richardson and Van Driel (this issue). The authors' claim invites a closer inspection of how news is produced and disseminated.
ISSN:2211-4866
Enthält:Enthalten in: Review of religious research
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/3512179