James of Viterbo and the Late Thirteenth-Century Debate Concerning the Reality of the Possibles
This paper reconstructs the teaching of James of Viterbo on the ontological status of the possibles, and compares his position with those of Henry of Ghent and Godfrey of Fontaines. James holds that possibles are real only in a qualified sense, as objects of God’s power and knowledge. While James ap...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2007
|
| In: |
Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2007, Volume: 74, Issue: 2, Pages: 483-522 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1822441439 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221115052820.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221115s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/RTPM.74.2.2024658 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1822441439 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1822441439 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gossiaux, Mark D. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a James of Viterbo and the Late Thirteenth-Century Debate Concerning the Reality of the Possibles |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper reconstructs the teaching of James of Viterbo on the ontological status of the possibles, and compares his position with those of Henry of Ghent and Godfrey of Fontaines. James holds that possibles are real only in a qualified sense, as objects of God’s power and knowledge. While James appears to have been influenced by Henry in his explanation of divine knowledge of creatures, in his analysis of the possibles he makes no use of Henry’s theory of esse essentiae, and he denies Henry’s claim that divine ideas function as exemplar causes of the possibiles. James’ theory is actually much closer to that of Godfrey, although Godfrey himself was highly critical of James’ teaching.\n4207 \n4207 | ||
| 601 | |a Viterbo | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales |d Leuven : Peeters, 1997 |g 74(2007), 2, Seite 483-522 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)387427848 |w (DE-600)2145018-3 |w (DE-576)112775624 |x 1783-1717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:74 |g year:2007 |g number:2 |g pages:483-522 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646492218 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/26172279 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.74.2.2024658 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=2024658&journal_code=RTPM |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 74 |j 2007 |e 2 |h 483-522 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4211084860 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1822441439 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221115052820 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-27#117E99F8FCA5ACA6DA841C67F099A41551A4E89E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/26172279 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||