Is Theism Compatible With Moral Error Theory?
This paper considers whether theism is compatible with moral error theory. This issue is neglected, perhaps because it is widely assumed that these views are incompatible. I argue that this is mistaken. In so doing, I articulate the best argument for thinking that theism and moral error theory are i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
2022
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 14, Issue: 3, Pages: 1-20 |
Further subjects: | B
moral properties
|
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 182250841X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221115113643.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221115s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.2022.3485 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)182250841X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP182250841X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1272015416 |0 (DE-627)1820781380 |4 aut |a Lambert, St.John | |
109 | |a Lambert, St.John |a Lambert, St. John |a Lambert, St John |a Lambert, StJohn | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Theism Compatible With Moral Error Theory? |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper considers whether theism is compatible with moral error theory. This issue is neglected, perhaps because it is widely assumed that these views are incompatible. I argue that this is mistaken. In so doing, I articulate the best argument for thinking that theism and moral error theory are incompatible. According to it, these views are incompatible because theism entails that God is morally good, and moral error theory entails that God is not. I reject this argument. Since it is the best argument for thinking that theism and moral error theory are incompatible, I conclude that these views are compatible: one can coherently accept both views. | ||
650 | 4 | |a moral properties | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 14(2022), 3, Seite 1-20 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g pages:1-20 |
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/LAMITC-3.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3485 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/view/3485 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4211269542 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 182250841X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221115113643 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |