Rethinking the Place of the Pentateuch in Late Persian and Hellenistic-era ‘Priestly’ Literature
A significant amount of literature was composed in the late Persian and Hellenistic periods that demonstrates a marked interest in priestly and priestly-adjacent matters. This literature has typically been analyzed with an assumption that the Pentateuch serves as a kind of “base text” that these aut...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2022
|
In: |
Journal of ancient Judaism
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 3, Pages: 257-284 |
Further subjects: | B
Temple
B Aristeas B Priestly B Sacrifice B Pentateuch B Aramaic Levi Document B Chronicles |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | A significant amount of literature was composed in the late Persian and Hellenistic periods that demonstrates a marked interest in priestly and priestly-adjacent matters. This literature has typically been analyzed with an assumption that the Pentateuch serves as a kind of “base text” that these authors used to create their texts. In this article, I pose what is normally taken as the starting point for the analysis of this material as the question to be answered: do Persian and Hellenistic-era Jewish authors writing about priestly-related matters draw on the Pentateuch? And if so, how are they engaging with it in their own compositions? To answer these questions, I examine three compositions: Chronicles, the Letter of Aristeas, and the Aramaic Levi Document. My analysis of these three texts shows that they have a broad range of engagement with the pentateuchal priestly writings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2196-7954 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of ancient Judaism
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30965/21967954-bja10026 |