A Critical Rejoinder to “Empirical Taxonomy of Religious Individual: An Investigation among College Students”

Filsinger, Faulkner, and Warland's (1979) claim of empirical validity for their taxonomy of religious individuals is evaluated in light of further post hoc analyses of their data. The results of these post hoc analyses indicate that their taxonomy of religious individuals has not been empirical...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hood, Ralph W. (Author) ; Morris, Ronald J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] 1980
In: Sociological analysis
Year: 1980, Volume: 41, Issue: 3, Pages: 265-267
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1823096328
003 DE-627
005 20221122052553.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221122s1980 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3710403  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1823096328 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1823096328 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hood, Ralph W.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Critical Rejoinder to “Empirical Taxonomy of Religious Individual: An Investigation among College Students” 
264 1 |c 1980 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Filsinger, Faulkner, and Warland's (1979) claim of empirical validity for their taxonomy of religious individuals is evaluated in light of further post hoc analyses of their data. The results of these post hoc analyses indicate that their taxonomy of religious individuals has not been empirically validated. 
601 |a Taxonomie 
601 |a Individuation 
601 |a Student 
700 1 |a Morris, Ronald J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sociological analysis  |d Washington, DC : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1964  |g 41(1980), 3, Seite 265-267  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)522636381  |w (DE-600)2266083-5  |w (DE-576)263022102  |x 2325-7873  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:41  |g year:1980  |g number:3  |g pages:265-267 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3710403  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3710403  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article/41/3/265/1619716  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 421800501X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1823096328 
LOK |0 005 20221122052553 
LOK |0 008 221122||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-21#18764E6D8FE3586970492D3D3A8181B089C26E43 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3710403 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL