Enchantment and Disenchantment in Modernity: The Significance of “Religion” as a Sociological Category

This essay assesses the religion-and-society problematic in modernity in light of the processes of pluralization and institutional differentiation that occur as societies become increasingly integrated into the world-system. Traditional categories for understanding religion are based upon models tha...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Swatos, William H. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 1983
In: Sociological analysis
Year: 1983, Volume: 44, Issue: 4, Pages: 321-337
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1823098622
003 DE-627
005 20221122052556.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221122s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3711613  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1823098622 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1823098622 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Swatos, William H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Enchantment and Disenchantment in Modernity: The Significance of “Religion” as a Sociological Category 
264 1 |c 1983 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay assesses the religion-and-society problematic in modernity in light of the processes of pluralization and institutional differentiation that occur as societies become increasingly integrated into the world-system. Traditional categories for understanding religion are based upon models that no longer fit actual circumstances, if ever they did. In particular, the mystical-magical dimensions of religion—heretofore largely excluded as positive substantive elements for the sociology of religion—are urged as essential to understanding modern religiosity. Rationalization at the societal level has disenchanted institutional religion, but religion remains an important variable when conceptualized social-psychologically. Popular religion expresses a new enchantment (not re-enchantment) which operates differently from previous expectations. This should be the cause for theoretical reflection and reconstruction rather than despair or rejection. Religion can serve as one basis for the preservation of individuality in the face of an impersonal state. This understanding of “the function of religion in society” is virtually the direct opposite of traditional sociological conceptions. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sociological analysis  |d Washington, DC, 1964  |g 44(1983), 4, Seite 321-337  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)522636381  |w (DE-600)2266083-5  |w (DE-576)263022102  |x 2325-7873  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:1983  |g number:4  |g pages:321-337 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711613  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3711613  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article/44/4/321/1612574  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 44  |j 1983  |e 4  |h 321-337 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4218007314 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1823098622 
LOK |0 005 20221122052556 
LOK |0 008 221122||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-21#83AB86E7D6EACF3D8B8C813190602E14EE122EE8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711613 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL