How Many Ways Are There to Think Morally About War?

In both political science and ethics, interpreters of the meaning of war have learned to use typologies to separate one mode of evaluation from another. As a result of this diversity in moral evaluations of war, authors have partly talked past each other, with all good faith accusing each another of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yoder, John Howard 1927-1997 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1994
In: Journal of law and religion
Year: 1994, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 83-107
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1823287395
003 DE-627
005 20221123145842.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221123s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/1051625  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1823287395 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1823287395 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)119219239  |0 (DE-627)080018114  |0 (DE-576)163641900  |4 aut  |a Yoder, John Howard  |d 1927-1997 
109 |a Yoder, John Howard 1927-1997  |a Yoder, John 1927-1997  |a Yoder, John-Howard 1927-1997  |a Yoder, John H. 1927-1997  |a Yoder, J.-H. 1927-1997 
245 1 0 |a How Many Ways Are There to Think Morally About War? 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In both political science and ethics, interpreters of the meaning of war have learned to use typologies to separate one mode of evaluation from another. As a result of this diversity in moral evaluations of war, authors have partly talked past each other, with all good faith accusing each another of confused categories. There has not been an agreed upon definitional base-line for just war theories "out there," which would permit just war theorists to judge other theories and communicate with each other.I propose to define more carefully the operative terms and kinds of argument used in just war theory, to assist communication on these topics. If we fail to clarify the variety of meanings and arguments, the result is imprecision and confusion. Our need is for a more precise understanding of the diversity of the modes of moral reasoning on just war. By surveying recent developments and usage in the field, this article will make it possible for just war scholars to engage each other using a more adequate, more nuanced set of types. While these types are not identical with current dominant usage, they are reconcilable with its main lines and more useful as instruments of interpretation than the simpler systems. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of law and religion  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983  |g 11(1994), 1, Seite 83-107  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)461908581  |w (DE-600)2164472-X  |w (DE-576)273875132  |x 2163-3088  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:1994  |g number:1  |g pages:83-107 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1051625  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/how-many-ways-are-there-to-think-morally-about-war/A9209FCABF500DB7A3D247A4D68503DE  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 421870936X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1823287395 
LOK |0 005 20221123144658 
LOK |0 008 221123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL