The Supreme Court's Assault on Free Exercise, and the Amicus Brief That Was Never Filed
On April 17, 1990, in Employment Division v Smith, the Supreme Court decided that neutral laws of general applicability may be applied to restrict or forbid religious exercise, and that such applications raise no issue under the free exercise clause. The opinion removes many of the issues discussed...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1990
|
| In: |
Journal of law and religion
Year: 1990, Volume: 8, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 99-114 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1823297234 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221123162512.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221123s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/1051259 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1823297234 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1823297234 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Laycock, Douglas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Supreme Court's Assault on Free Exercise, and the Amicus Brief That Was Never Filed |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1990 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a On April 17, 1990, in Employment Division v Smith, the Supreme Court decided that neutral laws of general applicability may be applied to restrict or forbid religious exercise, and that such applications raise no issue under the free exercise clause. The opinion removes many of the issues discussed in this journal from the scope of positive constitutional law.The Court noted some exceptions. Whether anything remains of free exercise depends on future cases interpreting those exceptions and interpreting the Court's requirement that laws regulating religion be neutral. The Court recognized constitutional protection for religious speech and religious instruction of children, and if interpreted generously, those exceptions could protect a large proportion of religious conduct. If the exceptions and the neutrality requirement are interpreted narrowly, the free exercise clause has little independent content. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of law and religion |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983 |g 8(1990), 1/2, Seite 99-114 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)461908581 |w (DE-600)2164472-X |w (DE-576)273875132 |x 2163-3088 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:1990 |g number:1/2 |g pages:99-114 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1051259 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/supreme-courts-assault-on-free-exercise-and-the-amicus-brief-that-was-never-filed/330AA93B56C11CBC45C41BC9FD31446D |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 1990 |e 1/2 |h 99-114 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4218755434 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1823297234 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221123162512 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||