Contending for the Future: Overcoming the Pfefferian Inversion

"One area of intense controversy concerns the First Amendment Religious Liberty clauses, whose mutually reinforcing provisions act as a double guarantee of religious liberty, one part barring the making of any law ‘respecting an establishment of religion’ and the other barring any law ‘prohibit...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Neuhaus, Richard John 1936-2009 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1990
In: Journal of law and religion
Year: 1990, Volume: 8, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 115-129
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1823297242
003 DE-627
005 20221123172039.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221123s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/1051260  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1823297242 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1823297242 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)11952709X  |0 (DE-627)060252448  |0 (DE-576)212884093  |4 aut  |a Neuhaus, Richard John  |d 1936-2009 
109 |a Neuhaus, Richard John 1936-2009  |a Neuhaus, Richard J. 1936-2009 
245 1 0 |a Contending for the Future  |b Overcoming the Pfefferian Inversion 
264 1 |c 1990 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a "One area of intense controversy concerns the First Amendment Religious Liberty clauses, whose mutually reinforcing provisions act as a double guarantee of religious liberty, one part barring the making of any law ‘respecting an establishment of religion’ and the other barring any law ‘prohibiting the free exercise thereof. … Religious liberty is the only freedom in the First Amendment to be given two provisions. Together the clauses form a strong bulwark against suppression of religious liberty."— The Williamsburg CharterWe are contending for the free exercise of religion in a democratic and pluralistic society. We would not be contending for it if we thought the free exercise of religion is adequately understood and protected at present. Critical to this contention is rethinking the religion clause of the First Amendment, and the larger part of this article is devoted to that rethinking. I will then offer some observations on the forces shaping this contention in the public arena today, and comment on the goal of a religiously informed public philosophy for our society's democratic experiment in republican governance. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of law and religion  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983  |g 8(1990), 1/2, Seite 115-129  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)461908581  |w (DE-600)2164472-X  |w (DE-576)273875132  |x 2163-3088  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:1990  |g number:1/2  |g pages:115-129 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1051260  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/contending-for-the-future-overcoming-the-pfefferian-inversion/DD88DCDCB5636D459C726591FBD9C1A7  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4218755442 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1823297242 
LOK |0 005 20221123162513 
LOK |0 008 221123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL