Social Darwinism and Natural Theodicy

Abstract. Despite the harsh scientific basis of Social Darwinism, its followers strove to unify nature with humane feelings—for world views necessarily attempt such reconciliations. To answer the difficult “problem of evil” posed by natural selection and survival of the fittest, Social Darwinists su...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oates, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- 1988
In: Zygon
Year: 1988, Volume: 23, Issue: 4, Pages: 439-459
Further subjects:B Social Darwinism
B Progress
B Theodicy
B Individualism
B problem of evil
B Organicism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827948450
003 DE-627
005 20221220052601.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1988.tb00858.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827948450 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827948450 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Oates, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Oates, David 
245 1 0 |a Social Darwinism and Natural Theodicy 
264 1 |c 1988 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract. Despite the harsh scientific basis of Social Darwinism, its followers strove to unify nature with humane feelings—for world views necessarily attempt such reconciliations. To answer the difficult “problem of evil” posed by natural selection and survival of the fittest, Social Darwinists such as Charles Darwin, Alfred Russel Wallace, and Herbert Spencer resorted to three kinds of theodicy: sentimental denial of the problem, belief in progress, and belief in perfection. Spencer's writings particulary display at different times both a rigid individualism and a softer organicism. Eventually, however, T. H. Huxley would abandon the attempt, acknowledging in effect that no complete world view was possible. 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
650 4 |a Social Darwinism 
650 4 |a Progress 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
650 4 |a Organicism 
650 4 |a Individualism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966  |g 23(1988), 4, Seite 439-459  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:1988  |g number:4  |g pages:439-459 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1637650302  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1988.tb00858.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1988.tb00858.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235353365 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827948450 
LOK |0 005 20221220052601 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#D94C5ADE9148FA6C73CBD70AC5FD961B7B4ED0AE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL