Theology and the Social Sciences—Discipline and Antidiscipline
Abstract. In this review of papers by E. O. Wilson, Philip Gorski, and Robert Segal, I apply Wilson's description of the relations between a discipline and its antidiscipline (the science just below it in the hierarchy of sciences) to the relations between theology and the social sciences. I cl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
1990
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 1990, Volume: 25, Issue: 3, Pages: 309-316 |
| Further subjects: | B
relation to theology
B Segal B Social Sciences |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827949015 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052602.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00794.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827949015 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827949015 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Murphy, Nancy |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Theology and the Social Sciences—Discipline and Antidiscipline |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1990 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract. In this review of papers by E. O. Wilson, Philip Gorski, and Robert Segal, I apply Wilson's description of the relations between a discipline and its antidiscipline (the science just below it in the hierarchy of sciences) to the relations between theology and the social sciences. I claim (contra Gorski) that a common methodology is applicable to natural science, social science, and theology. However, despite the fact that a discipline cannot ordinarily be reduced to its antidiscipline, I claim (with Segal) that it remains to be shown that a theistic interpretation of religious phenomena is superior to a social-scientific explanation. I see this as work to be done rather than an impossibility. Insofar as it is shown that theology cannot be reduced to social-scientific explanations, support is provided for the hypothesis of the existence of God. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a relation to theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Segal | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966 |g 25(1990), 3, Seite 309-316 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:1990 |g number:3 |g pages:309-316 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00794.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00794.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235353926 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827949015 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052602 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#2FBDB0C05073DE328473FB4FE102DEDB60EBD0DC | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||