Chemistry: What Does One Need to Know?

Abstract. The general knowledge and understanding that every teacher of religion and science should have relative to chemistry can be found in the answers to three major questions. In my own response to the first question, How did chemistry emerge as a discipline? I trace the origins, establishment,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zygon
Main Author: Utke, Allen R (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 1996
In: Zygon
Further subjects:B Reality
B Chemistry
B return to cosmology
B IRAM
B Cosmology
B breakdown of cosmology
B (re)integration of science and religion
B URAM
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827951761
003 DE-627
005 20221220052606.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1996.tb00042.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827951761 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827951761 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Utke, Allen R  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Chemistry: What Does One Need to Know? 
264 1 |c 1996 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract. The general knowledge and understanding that every teacher of religion and science should have relative to chemistry can be found in the answers to three major questions. In my own response to the first question, How did chemistry emerge as a discipline? I trace the origins, establishment, and subsequent historical significance of cosmology. I contend that chemistry is “the obvious, oldest science” and, as such, has played a key role among the sciences in agelong human efforts to understand reality. In my response to the second question, How do chemists currently view (cosmic) reality? I outline three prominent examples in support of my contention that chemistry, despite being “the obvious, oldest science,” is seen by some as playing only a tacit role in current efforts to (re)integrate religion and science. In my response to the third question, How do chemists currently view ultimate reality and meaning? I argue that “unifiers” in chemistry can also now play a key role in a reality revolution that is pointing humankind not only toward a possible historical (re) integration of religion and science but also toward a return to cosmology. 
650 4 |a URAM 
650 4 |a return to cosmology 
650 4 |a (re)integration of science and religion 
650 4 |a Reality 
650 4 |a IRAM 
650 4 |a Cosmology 
650 4 |a Chemistry 
650 4 |a breakdown of cosmology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 31(1996), 3, Seite 497-507  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:1996  |g number:3  |g pages:497-507 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)163978912X  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1996.tb00042.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1996.tb00042.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 31  |j 1996  |e 3  |h 497-507 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235356674 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827951761 
LOK |0 005 20221220052606 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#618BBF4F38A01CFAD749429E132C7A6A8DE304E9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL