Huston Smith Replies to Barbour, Goodenough, and Peterson
Responses and clarifications are given to the three respondents to my recent book, Why Religion Matters, in which I discuss what I see as the drawbacks and inconsistencies of Darwinism. While certain of their criticisms are understandable, others are based on a misreading of my work. Finally, my cri...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
2001
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2001, Volume: 36, Issue: 2, Pages: 223-231 |
| Further subjects: | B
Scientism
B Gregory Peterson B intelligentdesign B Transcendence B Ursula Goodenough B Naturalism B Reductionism B evolutionary theory B Darwinism B Ian Barbour |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827954558 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052611.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/0591-2385.00353 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827954558 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827954558 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Smith, Huston |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Huston Smith Replies to Barbour, Goodenough, and Peterson |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2001 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Responses and clarifications are given to the three respondents to my recent book, Why Religion Matters, in which I discuss what I see as the drawbacks and inconsistencies of Darwinism. While certain of their criticisms are understandable, others are based on a misreading of my work. Finally, my critics fail to show that my book is mistaken in its central claim that the modern loss of faith in transcendence, basic to the traditional/religious worldview, is unwarranted, because science has not been able to disprove the metaphysical claim that transcendence exists. | ||
| 601 | |a Smith, Huston | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Transcendence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Scientism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reductionism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gregory Peterson | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a intelligentdesign | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ursula Goodenough | |
| 650 | 4 | |a evolutionary theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Darwinism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ian Barbour | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966 |g 36(2001), 2, Seite 223-231 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2001 |g number:2 |g pages:223-231 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00353 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0591-2385.00353 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235359460 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827954558 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052611 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#70C15D7BEAE422C5C52759AB0487214CAD8EC852 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||