Theism, Evolutionary Epistemology, and Two Theories of Truth

In Michael Ruse's recent publications, such as Taking Darwin Seriously (1998) and Evolutionary Naturalism (1995), he has advocated a certain sort of evolutionary epistemology and has argued that it implies a rejection of metaphysical realism (MR) in favor of a position that he calls “internal r...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lemos, John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- 2002
In: Zygon
Year: 2002, Volume: 37, Issue: 4, Pages: 789-801
Further subjects:B internal realism (IR)
B Theism
B Michael Ruse
B metaphysical realism (MR)
B Epistemology
B Alvin Plantinga
B Evolution
B epistemically ideal conditions
B Naturalism
B Truth
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827955678
003 DE-627
005 20221220052612.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1467-9744.00458  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827955678 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827955678 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lemos, John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Theism, Evolutionary Epistemology, and Two Theories of Truth 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In Michael Ruse's recent publications, such as Taking Darwin Seriously (1998) and Evolutionary Naturalism (1995), he has advocated a certain sort of evolutionary epistemology and has argued that it implies a rejection of metaphysical realism (MR) in favor of a position that he calls “internal realism” (IR). Additionally, he has maintained that, insofar as his evolutionary epistemology implies a rejection of MR in favor of IR, it escapes the kind of argument against naturalism that Alvin Plantinga makes in his Warrant and Proper Function (1993). In this article I explain the relevant views and arguments of Ruse and Plantinga, and I critically engage with Ruse's views, arguing that (1) his case for rejecting MR has no essential connection to evolutionary considerations; (2) his case for rejecting MR depends upon internalist assumptions about the nature of knowledge that are in need of some kind of defense; and (3) given his implicit internalism and his commitment to IR, his argument for rejecting MR can be used against his IR. 
650 4 |a Truth 
650 4 |a Theism 
650 4 |a Michael Ruse 
650 4 |a Alvin Plantinga 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a metaphysical realism (MR) 
650 4 |a internal realism (IR) 
650 4 |a Evolution 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a epistemically ideal conditions 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966  |g 37(2002), 4, Seite 789-801  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2002  |g number:4  |g pages:789-801 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9744.00458  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9744.00458  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235360582 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827955678 
LOK |0 005 20221220052612 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#5B0407105D5D3B1E4D44BBFE02B726D63CF11259 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Evolution,Evolution 
STB 0 0 |a Évolution,Évolution 
STC 0 0 |a Evolución 
STD 0 0 |a Evoluzione 
STE 0 0 |a 进化,演变 
STF 0 0 |a 進化,演變 
STG 0 0 |a Evolução 
STH 0 0 |a Эволюция 
STI 0 0 |a Εξέλιξη 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Abstammung