Risk and Religion: Toward a Theology of Risk Taking
Historically the concept of risk is rooted in Renaissance lifestyles, in which autonomous agents such as sailors, warriors, and tradesmen ventured upon dangerous enterprises. Thus, the concept of risk inseparably combines objective reality (nature) and social construction (culture): Risk = Danger +...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
2003
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2003, Volume: 38, Issue: 2, Pages: 355-376 |
| Further subjects: | B
Niklas Luhmann
B Incarnation B Autopoiesis B risk theory B Providence B Trinity B Theodicy B Religion B Ulrich Beck B Trust B Complexity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827956100 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220235127.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1467-9744.00504 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827956100 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827956100 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)132273942 |0 (DE-627)520398475 |0 (DE-576)166080500 |4 aut |a Gregersen, Niels Henrik |d 1956- | |
| 109 | |a Gregersen, Niels Henrik 1956- |a Gregersen, Niels H. 1956- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk and Religion: Toward a Theology of Risk Taking |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Historically the concept of risk is rooted in Renaissance lifestyles, in which autonomous agents such as sailors, warriors, and tradesmen ventured upon dangerous enterprises. Thus, the concept of risk inseparably combines objective reality (nature) and social construction (culture): Risk = Danger + Venture. Mathematical probability theory was constructed in this social climate in order to provide a quantitative risk assessment in the face of indeterminate futures. Thus we have the famous formula: Risk = Probability (of events) × the Size (of future harms). Because the concept of harm is always observer relative, however, risk assessment cannot be purely quantitative. This leads to the question, What are the general conditions under which risks can be accepted? There is, after all, a difference between incurring a risk and bearing the costs of risks selected for by other agencies. Against this background, contours of a theology of risk emerge. If God creates a self-organizing world of relatively autonomous agents, and if self-organization is favored by cooperative networks of autopoietic processes, then the theological hypothesis of a risk-taking God is at least initially plausible. Moreover, according to the Christian idea of incarnation, God is not only taking a risk but is also bearing the risks implied by the openness of creation. I thus argue for a twofold divine kenosis—in creation as well as in redemption. I discuss some objections to this view, including the serious counterargument that risk taking on behalf of others remains, even for God, a morally dubious task. What are the conditions under which the notion of a risk-taking God can be affirmed without leaving us with the picture of God as an arbitrary, cosmic tyrant? And what are the practical implications for the ways in which human agents of faith, hope, and love can learn to cope with the risks of everyday life and of political decisions? | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Trust | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trinity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theodicy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a risk theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Providence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Niklas Luhmann | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Incarnation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Complexity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ulrich Beck | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autopoiesis | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966 |g 38(2003), 2, Seite 355-376 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2003 |g number:2 |g pages:355-376 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1645502163 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9744.00504 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9744.00504 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235361015 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827956100 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052613 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#104D923AEF81E82D27A1377A8897551BD8EE8898 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REF | |a Religionstheorie | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature,Trust |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religions,Religion,Trust |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Religión,Religión,Religión,Trust |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Religione,Religione,Religione,Trust |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,托拉斯 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Religião,Religião,Trust |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Trust,Траст,Религия (мотив),Религия |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Τραστ,Trust,Εμπίστευμα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |