Taking Theology and Science Seriously Without Category Mistakes: A Response to Ian Barbour
Abstract. In my response to Ian Barbour's criticisms, I first argue for the anthropological dimensions and contextuality of any theology. Next I examine and criticize Barbour's thesis that I am an in-compatibilist about divine action. Finally I illustrate the fact that I see genuine opport...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
2008
|
In: |
Zygon
Year: 2008, Volume: 43, Issue: 1, Pages: 271-276 |
Further subjects: | B
Theology
B primary and secondary causality B Paul Bloom B Justin Barrett B Divine Action B compatibil-ism B Ian Barbour B evolutionary explanations of religion |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1827959967 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221220235138.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221220s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00912.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1827959967 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827959967 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)173720064 |0 (DE-627)698626214 |0 (DE-576)134561252 |4 aut |a Smedes, Taede Anne |d 1973- | |
109 | |a Smedes, Taede Anne 1973- |a Smedes, T. A. 1973- |a Smedes, Taede A. 1973- |a Smedes, Taede 1973- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Taking Theology and Science Seriously Without Category Mistakes: A Response to Ian Barbour |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract. In my response to Ian Barbour's criticisms, I first argue for the anthropological dimensions and contextuality of any theology. Next I examine and criticize Barbour's thesis that I am an in-compatibilist about divine action. Finally I illustrate the fact that I see genuine opportunities for a dialogue between theologians and scientists without apologetics, category mistakes, or relegating theology to the fringes of science, by pointing to evolutionary explanations of religion. | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
601 | |a Barbour, Ian G. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
650 | 4 | |a primary and secondary causality | |
650 | 4 | |a evolutionary explanations of religion | |
650 | 4 | |a Divine Action | |
650 | 4 | |a compatibil-ism | |
650 | 4 | |a Paul Bloom | |
650 | 4 | |a Justin Barrett | |
650 | 4 | |a Ian Barbour | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966 |g 43(2008), 1, Seite 271-276 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |g year:2008 |g number:1 |g pages:271-276 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646978102 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00912.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00912.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4235364871 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1827959967 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221220052619 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#BAD69BBC6E91767EF9E7BD0854AFB67692307C5F | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |