Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones

Abstract. Four arguments are examined in order to assess the state of the Intelligent Design debate. First, critics continually cite the fact that ID proponents have religious motivations. When used as criticism of ID arguments, this is an obvious ad hominem. Nonetheless, philosophers and scientists...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Koperski, Jeffrey (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- 2008
In: Zygon
Year: 2008, Volume: 43, Issue: 2, Pages: 433-449
Further subjects:B Conservatism
B Intelligent design
B theory change
B Dover trial
B Methodological Naturalism
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827960094
003 DE-627
005 20221220052619.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827960094 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827960094 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Koperski, Jeffrey  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Koperski, Jeffrey 
245 1 0 |a Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract. Four arguments are examined in order to assess the state of the Intelligent Design debate. First, critics continually cite the fact that ID proponents have religious motivations. When used as criticism of ID arguments, this is an obvious ad hominem. Nonetheless, philosophers and scientists alike continue to wield such arguments for their rhetorical value. Second, in his expert testimony in the Dover trial, philosopher Robert Pennock used repudiated claims in order to brand ID as a kind of pseudoscience. His arguments hinge on the nature of methodological naturalism as a metatheoretic shaping principle. We examine the use of such principles in science and the history of science. Special attention is given to the demarcation problem. Third, the scientific merits of ID are examined. Critics rightly demand more than promissory notes for ID to move beyond the fringe. Fourth, although methodological naturalism gets a lot of attention, there is another shaping principle to contend with, namely, conservatism. Science, like most disciplines, tends to change in an incremental rather than revolutionary manner. When ID is compared to other non- or quasi-Darwinian proposals, it appears to be a more radical solution than is needed in the face of the anomalies. 
650 4 |a theory change 
650 4 |a Methodological Naturalism 
650 4 |a Intelligent Design 
650 4 |a Dover trial 
650 4 |a Conservatism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966  |g 43(2008), 2, Seite 433-449  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2008  |g number:2  |g pages:433-449 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646166183  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235365002 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827960094 
LOK |0 005 20221220052619 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#3925E9AD37DEF8F477214997044601728E44F5D7 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory 
STB 0 0 |a Dessein intelligent 
STC 0 0 |a Diseño inteligente 
STD 0 0 |a Disegno intelligente 
STG 0 0 |a Desenho inteligente 
STH 0 0 |a Интеллегентный дизайн 
STI 0 0 |a Ευφυής σχεδιασμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh