Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones
Abstract. Four arguments are examined in order to assess the state of the Intelligent Design debate. First, critics continually cite the fact that ID proponents have religious motivations. When used as criticism of ID arguments, this is an obvious ad hominem. Nonetheless, philosophers and scientists...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
2008
|
In: |
Zygon
Year: 2008, Volume: 43, Issue: 2, Pages: 433-449 |
Further subjects: | B
Conservatism
B Intelligent design B theory change B Dover trial B Methodological Naturalism |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1827960094 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221220052619.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221220s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1827960094 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827960094 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Koperski, Jeffrey |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Koperski, Jeffrey | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract. Four arguments are examined in order to assess the state of the Intelligent Design debate. First, critics continually cite the fact that ID proponents have religious motivations. When used as criticism of ID arguments, this is an obvious ad hominem. Nonetheless, philosophers and scientists alike continue to wield such arguments for their rhetorical value. Second, in his expert testimony in the Dover trial, philosopher Robert Pennock used repudiated claims in order to brand ID as a kind of pseudoscience. His arguments hinge on the nature of methodological naturalism as a metatheoretic shaping principle. We examine the use of such principles in science and the history of science. Special attention is given to the demarcation problem. Third, the scientific merits of ID are examined. Critics rightly demand more than promissory notes for ID to move beyond the fringe. Fourth, although methodological naturalism gets a lot of attention, there is another shaping principle to contend with, namely, conservatism. Science, like most disciplines, tends to change in an incremental rather than revolutionary manner. When ID is compared to other non- or quasi-Darwinian proposals, it appears to be a more radical solution than is needed in the face of the anomalies. | ||
650 | 4 | |a theory change | |
650 | 4 | |a Methodological Naturalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Intelligent Design | |
650 | 4 | |a Dover trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Conservatism | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966 |g 43(2008), 2, Seite 433-449 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |g year:2008 |g number:2 |g pages:433-449 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646166183 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4235365002 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1827960094 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221220052619 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#3925E9AD37DEF8F477214997044601728E44F5D7 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dessein intelligent |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Diseño inteligente |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Disegno intelligente |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Desenho inteligente |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Интеллегентный дизайн |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ευφυής σχεδιασμός |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh |