Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion

Abstract. People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, cri...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Walhout, Matthew (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2010
In: Zygon
Year: 2010, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 558-574
Further subjects:B philosophy of practice
B aims of science
B Charles Taylor
B Essentialism
B philosophy of science
B Objectivity
B Critical Realism
B Science and religion
B Joseph Rouse
B scientific practices
B Christian Philosophy
B Hermeneutics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827961864
003 DE-627
005 20221220052622.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01113.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827961864 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827961864 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Walhout, Matthew  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract. People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, to label a practice as “scientific” is to make a practically motivated provision for a way of speaking. Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse have produced complementary philosophies of practice that promote this kind of understanding. In this essay I review the work of Taylor and Rouse, identify apparent residues of essentialism that each seems to harbor, and offer a resolution to some of their disagreements. I also criticize a form of essentialism commonly employed in Christian circles and outline an anti-essentialist view of science that may be helpful in science-and-religion discussions. 
601 |a Rouse, Joseph 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Charles Taylor 
650 4 |a scientific practices 
650 4 |a Science and religion 
650 4 |a Joseph Rouse 
650 4 |a philosophy of science 
650 4 |a philosophy of practice 
650 4 |a Objectivity 
650 4 |a Hermeneutics 
650 4 |a Essentialism 
650 4 |a Critical Realism 
650 4 |a Christian Philosophy 
650 4 |a aims of science 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 45(2010), 3, Seite 558-574  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2010  |g number:3  |g pages:558-574 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646911377  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01113.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01113.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 45  |j 2010  |e 3  |h 558-574 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235366777 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827961864 
LOK |0 005 20221220052622 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#0AB74B993F60348639555F2DF1D670E24754F5BC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL