A Dynamic Model for “Science and Religion”: Interacting Subcultures

Abstract: I argue that for psychological and social reasons, the traditional “Conflict Model” of science and religion interactions has such a strong hold on the nonexpert imagination that counterexamples and claims that interactions are simply more complex than the model allows are inadequate to und...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olson, Richard (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- 2011
In: Zygon
Year: 2011, Volume: 46, Issue: 1, Pages: 65-83
Further subjects:B master narratives
B Integration
B Richard Hooker
B Dialogue
B interacting subcultures model
B Independence
B conflict model
B Isaac Newton
B Ian Barbour
B science and religion interactions
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827962283
003 DE-627
005 20221220052623.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01158.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827962283 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827962283 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Olson, Richard  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Dynamic Model for “Science and Religion”: Interacting Subcultures 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract: I argue that for psychological and social reasons, the traditional “Conflict Model” of science and religion interactions has such a strong hold on the nonexpert imagination that counterexamples and claims that interactions are simply more complex than the model allows are inadequate to undermine its power. Taxonomies, such as those of Ian Barbour and John Haught, which characterize conflict as only one among several possible relationships, help. But these taxonomies, by themselves, fail to offer an account of why different relationships prevail among different communities and how they succeed one another within particular communities—that is, they contain no dynamic elements. To undermine the power of the “Conflict Model,” we should be seeking to offer alternative models for science and religion interactions that can both incorporate the range of stances articulated by scholars like Barbour and which can offer an account of the process by which differing attitudes succeed one another. As a step toward this goal, I propose a general “interacting subcultures model” and illustrate its applicability in a small number of mini-case studies from Early Modern Britain and France and with glances toward contemporary America. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a science and religion interactions 
650 4 |a Isaac Newton 
650 4 |a master narratives 
650 4 |a interacting subcultures model 
650 4 |a Integration 
650 4 |a Independence 
650 4 |a Richard Hooker 
650 4 |a Dialog 
650 4 |a conflict model 
650 4 |a Ian Barbour 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966  |g 46(2011), 1, Seite 65-83  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:46  |g year:2011  |g number:1  |g pages:65-83 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01158.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01158.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235367196 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827962283 
LOK |0 005 20221220052623 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#701EC6B2E94D0F164AA41A80FD8E32AD179966F1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialog,Dialogue,Integration,Integration,Regional integration,Absorption 
STB 0 0 |a Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialogue,Intégration,Intégration,Intégration 
STC 0 0 |a Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Integración,Integración,Integración 
STD 0 0 |a Dialogo,Dialogo,Dialogo,Dialogo,Integrazione,Integrazione civica <politica>,Integrazione,Integrazione (politica),Integrazione 
STE 0 0 |a 对话,对话,整合,整合,融合,集成,融合,集成 
STF 0 0 |a 對話,對話,整合,区域整合,整合,融合,集成,融合,集成 
STG 0 0 |a Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Integração,Integração,Integração regional,Integração 
STH 0 0 |a Диалог (музыка),Диалог (литературный жанр),Диалог (мотив),Диалог,Интеграция (мотив),Интеграция (политика),Интеграция 
STI 0 0 |a Διάλογος (μουσική),Διάλογος (λογοτεχνικό είδος),Διάλογος (μοτίβο),Διάλογος,Ενσωμάτωση <μοτίβο>,Ένταξη (πολιτική),Ενσωμάτωση,Ένταξη,Ένταξη (μοτίβο) 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Politische Integration,Internationale Integration,Regionale Integration , Mittelstandskongress,Kongress für den Mittelstand,Dialogue , Dialogliteratur,Zwiegespräch,Dialoge,Dialogue,Wechselrede