A Dynamic Model for “Science and Religion”: Interacting Subcultures
Abstract: I argue that for psychological and social reasons, the traditional “Conflict Model” of science and religion interactions has such a strong hold on the nonexpert imagination that counterexamples and claims that interactions are simply more complex than the model allows are inadequate to und...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities$s2024-
2011
|
In: |
Zygon
Year: 2011, Volume: 46, Issue: 1, Pages: 65-83 |
Further subjects: | B
master narratives
B Integration B Richard Hooker B Dialogue B interacting subcultures model B Independence B conflict model B Isaac Newton B Ian Barbour B science and religion interactions |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1827962283 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221220052623.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221220s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01158.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1827962283 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827962283 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Olson, Richard |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Dynamic Model for “Science and Religion”: Interacting Subcultures |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract: I argue that for psychological and social reasons, the traditional “Conflict Model” of science and religion interactions has such a strong hold on the nonexpert imagination that counterexamples and claims that interactions are simply more complex than the model allows are inadequate to undermine its power. Taxonomies, such as those of Ian Barbour and John Haught, which characterize conflict as only one among several possible relationships, help. But these taxonomies, by themselves, fail to offer an account of why different relationships prevail among different communities and how they succeed one another within particular communities—that is, they contain no dynamic elements. To undermine the power of the “Conflict Model,” we should be seeking to offer alternative models for science and religion interactions that can both incorporate the range of stances articulated by scholars like Barbour and which can offer an account of the process by which differing attitudes succeed one another. As a step toward this goal, I propose a general “interacting subcultures model” and illustrate its applicability in a small number of mini-case studies from Early Modern Britain and France and with glances toward contemporary America. | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
650 | 4 | |a science and religion interactions | |
650 | 4 | |a Isaac Newton | |
650 | 4 | |a master narratives | |
650 | 4 | |a interacting subcultures model | |
650 | 4 | |a Integration | |
650 | 4 | |a Independence | |
650 | 4 | |a Richard Hooker | |
650 | 4 | |a Dialog | |
650 | 4 | |a conflict model | |
650 | 4 | |a Ian Barbour | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zygon |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966 |g 46(2011), 1, Seite 65-83 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300593570 |w (DE-600)1482903-4 |w (DE-576)090854799 |x 1467-9744 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2011 |g number:1 |g pages:65-83 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01158.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01158.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4235367196 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1827962283 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221220052623 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#701EC6B2E94D0F164AA41A80FD8E32AD179966F1 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialog,Dialogue,Integration,Integration,Regional integration,Absorption |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialogue,Dialogue,Intégration,Intégration,Intégration |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Integración,Integración,Integración |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dialogo,Dialogo,Dialogo,Dialogo,Integrazione,Integrazione civica <politica>,Integrazione,Integrazione (politica),Integrazione |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 对话,对话,整合,整合,融合,集成,融合,集成 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 對話,對話,整合,区域整合,整合,融合,集成,融合,集成 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Diálogo,Integração,Integração,Integração regional,Integração |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Диалог (музыка),Диалог (литературный жанр),Диалог (мотив),Диалог,Интеграция (мотив),Интеграция (политика),Интеграция |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διάλογος (μουσική),Διάλογος (λογοτεχνικό είδος),Διάλογος (μοτίβο),Διάλογος,Ενσωμάτωση <μοτίβο>,Ένταξη (πολιτική),Ενσωμάτωση,Ένταξη,Ένταξη (μοτίβο) |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Politische Integration,Internationale Integration,Regionale Integration , Mittelstandskongress,Kongress für den Mittelstand,Dialogue , Dialogliteratur,Zwiegespräch,Dialoge,Dialogue,Wechselrede |