Ad Hominem Arguments and Intelligent Design: Reply to Koperski

Jeffrey Koperski claims in Zygon (2008) that critics of Intelligent Design engage in fallacious ad hominem attacks on ID proponents and that this is a “bad way” to engage them. I show that Koperski has made several errors in his evaluation of the ID critics. He does not distinguish legitimate, relev...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pynes, Christopher A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- 2012
In: Zygon
Year: 2012, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 289-297
Further subjects:B Conservatism
B Intelligent design
B Explanation
B Evolution
B Jeffrey Koperski
B Darwinism
B ad hominem
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827963212
003 DE-627
005 20221220052624.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01254.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827963212 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827963212 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Pynes, Christopher A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ad Hominem Arguments and Intelligent Design: Reply to Koperski 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Jeffrey Koperski claims in Zygon (2008) that critics of Intelligent Design engage in fallacious ad hominem attacks on ID proponents and that this is a “bad way” to engage them. I show that Koperski has made several errors in his evaluation of the ID critics. He does not distinguish legitimate, relevant ad hominem arguments from fallacious ad hominem attacks. He conflates (or equates) the logical use of valid with the colloquial use of valid. Moreover, Koperski doesn't take seriously the legitimate concerns of the ID critics, and in doing so, commits the straw man fallacy. In the end, I show that no one disagrees with the criticism of improper use of fallacies as methods of evaluation. But what constitutes proper, relevant evaluation of the ID theorists and their motivation is a matter of dispute. And sometimes attacking a person as a method of evaluation is justified, and thus is not fallacious. The definition of ad hominem arguments as either a “good way” or a “bad way” rests on justification, which I argue ID opponents have. The basis for these good objections relies on the motivation many Christians have to share their faith with non-Christians, which they call the “great commission.” 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Jeffrey Koperski 
650 4 |a Intelligent Design 
650 4 |a Explanation 
650 4 |a Evolution 
650 4 |a Darwinism 
650 4 |a Conservatism 
650 4 |a ad hominem 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966  |g 47(2012), 2, Seite 289-297  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:47  |g year:2012  |g number:2  |g pages:289-297 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)164668334X  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01254.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01254.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235368125 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827963212 
LOK |0 005 20221220052624 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#CF82691C212EBD400932EE0828721A20F349DE78 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Evolution,Evolution,Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory 
STB 0 0 |a Dessein intelligent,Évolution,Évolution 
STC 0 0 |a Diseño inteligente,Evolución 
STD 0 0 |a Disegno intelligente,Evoluzione 
STE 0 0 |a 进化,演变 
STF 0 0 |a 進化,演變 
STG 0 0 |a Desenho inteligente,Evolução 
STH 0 0 |a Интеллегентный дизайн,Эволюция 
STI 0 0 |a Εξέλιξη,Ευφυής σχεδιασμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh , Abstammung