A Peircean Response to the Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Knowledge

The evolutionary debunking argument advanced by Sharon Street, Michael Ruse, and Richard Joyce employs the logic of Paul Griffiths and John Wilkins to contend that humans cannot have knowledge of moral truths, since the evolutionary process that has produced our basic moral intuitions lacks causal c...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Slater, Gary (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- 2014
In: Zygon
Year: 2014, Volume: 49, Issue: 3, Pages: 593-611
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Epistemology
B Realism
B Values
B final causation
B Semiotics
B Darwinism
B Charles S. Peirce
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827964987
003 DE-627
005 20221220052628.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12104  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827964987 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827964987 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Slater, Gary  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Peircean Response to the Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Knowledge 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The evolutionary debunking argument advanced by Sharon Street, Michael Ruse, and Richard Joyce employs the logic of Paul Griffiths and John Wilkins to contend that humans cannot have knowledge of moral truths, since the evolutionary process that has produced our basic moral intuitions lacks causal connections to those (putative) truths. Yet this argument is self-defeating, because its aim is the categorical, normative claim that we should suspend our moral beliefs in light of the discoveries about their non-truth-tracking origins, when it is precisely this claim that relies upon the normativity under attack. This article cites Charles S. Peirce (1839–1914) to argue that such self-defeat can be avoided by expanding upon the basic structure of the argument put forth by Griffiths and Wilkins, provided that one embraces a version of realism that corresponds with Peirce's doctrine of final causation. So construed, final causation reconciles real generals (including real moral values) with natural selection and undergirds further speculation of moral facts within values per se. 
601 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Values 
650 4 |a Semiotics 
650 4 |a Realism 
650 4 |a Charles S. Peirce 
650 4 |a final causation 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a Darwinism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966  |g 49(2014), 3, Seite 593-611  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:593-611 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1641152168  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12104  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12104  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 423536989X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827964987 
LOK |0 005 20221220052628 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#9D5F2D87804895AE5CF051364CBFF0BB790B64A9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL