Is Finitude Original?: A Rereading of "Violence and Metaphysics"

This article seeks to challenge what may seem to be an obvious assertion: that finitude is original in the sense that it must be presupposed that any possible meaning can only be thought beginning from this finitude. I do this through a rereading of Derrida’s epochal essay "Violence and Metaphy...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rolfsen, Theodor Sandal (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2022
In: Open theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 173-190
Further subjects:B metaphysics of presence
B Heidegger
B Finitude
B Enjoyment
B Transcendence
B Levinas
B Derrida
B Philosophy of religion
B The Other
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1828260002
003 DE-627
005 20221221165638.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221221s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/opth-2022-0200  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1828260002 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1828260002 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rolfsen, Theodor Sandal  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Is Finitude Original?  |b A Rereading of "Violence and Metaphysics" 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article seeks to challenge what may seem to be an obvious assertion: that finitude is original in the sense that it must be presupposed that any possible meaning can only be thought beginning from this finitude. I do this through a rereading of Derrida’s epochal essay "Violence and Metaphysics," which perhaps is the most decisive interpretation of the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. In the essay, Derrida demonstrates how Levinas is forced to betray his own intentions in his attempt to describe the Other as transcendent. By making use of a newly published lecture series, Derrida held at the same time as writing the essay, I show how Derrida’s reading of Levinas is intimately tied to his interpretation of Heidegger’s critique of the metaphysics of presence, and how both Levinas and Derrida end up in the paradox I call "original finitude." I then show how new commentary literature on Levinas’ analysis of enjoyment gives us an alternative to Derrida’s notion of original finitude. I do not propose that this alternative overcomes Derrida’s problematic, but rather that it gives another option of how to relate to that which escapes the grasp of philosophy. The key difference will be whether transcendence is conceived as a failure of philosophy or its excess. 
601 |a Metaphysik 
650 4 |a Derrida 
650 4 |a Heidegger 
650 4 |a Levinas 
650 4 |a Enjoyment 
650 4 |a Finitude 
650 4 |a metaphysics of presence 
650 4 |a Philosophy of religion 
650 4 |a The Other 
650 4 |a Transcendence 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Open theology  |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 2015  |g 8(2022), 1, Seite 173-190  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)862721644  |w (DE-600)2861119-6  |w (DE-576)473650002  |x 2300-6579  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:173-190 
856 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2022-0200/pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2022-0200  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2022-0200/html  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4237366707 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1828260002 
LOK |0 005 20221221164423 
LOK |0 008 221221||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL