What Does Theology Have to Do With Religion?: Dual-process Accounts, Cognitive Science of Religion and a Curious Blind Spot in Contemporary Theorizing
In the cognitive science of religion (CSR), it is often claimed that religion is a product of information processing system that is nonconscious, automatic and irrational. This view rests on a theoretical basis provided by dual-process accounts (DPA) of reasoning. In this paper, I will provide some...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2016
|
| In: |
Open theology
Year: 2016, Volume: 2, Issue: 1, Pages: 106–112 |
| Further subjects: | B
cognitive science of religion
B dual process accounts B Debunking |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1829458450 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221222160604.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221222s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/opth-2016-0008 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1829458450 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1829458450 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)134210190 |0 (DE-627)563003995 |0 (DE-576)30037836X |4 aut |a Vainio, Olli-Pekka |d 1976- | |
| 109 | |a Vainio, Olli-Pekka 1976- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Does Theology Have to Do With Religion? |b Dual-process Accounts, Cognitive Science of Religion and a Curious Blind Spot in Contemporary Theorizing |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the cognitive science of religion (CSR), it is often claimed that religion is a product of information processing system that is nonconscious, automatic and irrational. This view rests on a theoretical basis provided by dual-process accounts (DPA) of reasoning. In this paper, I will provide some examples how DPAs are employed in contemporary theorizing in CSR and point out some problems, which reveal an oversight that may impede the progress of the scientific study of religion. The topic touches on the wider debate on evolutionary debunking arguments but my point concerns CSR theorizing and how it might not be able to understand religion properly. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive science of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Debunking | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dual process accounts | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Open theology |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 2015 |g 2(2016), 1, Seite 106–112 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)862721644 |w (DE-600)2861119-6 |w (DE-576)473650002 |x 2300-6579 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:106–112 |
| 856 | |u http://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/opth.2016.2.issue-1/opth-2016-0008/opth-2016-0008.xml |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0008 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2016-0008/html |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 2 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 106–112 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4239983681 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1829458450 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221222155442 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221222||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||