Can God Promise Us a New Past?: A Response to Lebens and Goldschmidt

Samuel Lebens and Tyron Goldschmidt provided original theodicies, which suggest that at one time God will change the past, either by erasing/substituting the sins of humans or erasing the whole entirety of evils. Both theodicies imply the idea that God can completely change the past without leaving...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Faul, Bogdan V. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2020
In: Open theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: 167-174
Further subjects:B eternalism
B moving spotlight theory
B hypertime
B Presentism
B necessary evil
B God
B Philosophy of time
B The problem of evil
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1830006428
003 DE-627
005 20221223133146.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221223s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/opth-2020-0014  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1830006428 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1830006428 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Faul, Bogdan V.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Can God Promise Us a New Past?  |b A Response to Lebens and Goldschmidt 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Samuel Lebens and Tyron Goldschmidt provided original theodicies, which suggest that at one time God will change the past, either by erasing/substituting the sins of humans or erasing the whole entirety of evils. Both theodicies imply the idea that God can completely change the past without leaving any traces. In this paper, I argue that Lebens’ and Goldschmidt’s preferred model, which they call the scene-changing theory, is problematic. First, its complex metaphysical foundation could be replaced with presentism (roughly, the view in the ontology of time that only present things exist) without losing any substantial heuristics. Second, their theory either implies a controversial theory of truthmaking under presentistic and hyper-presentistic ontology or implies controversial views on the counting of events under presentistic and hyper-presentistic ontology. Thirdly, I will argue that any theory of elimination/substitution of evils of the past implies that there are unnecessary evils, which is inconsistent with God’s goodness. 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a eternalism 
650 4 |a hypertime 
650 4 |a moving spotlight theory 
650 4 |a necessary evil 
650 4 |a Philosophy of time 
650 4 |a Presentism 
650 4 |a The problem of evil 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Open theology  |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 2015  |g 6(2020), 1, Seite 167-174  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)862721644  |w (DE-600)2861119-6  |w (DE-576)473650002  |x 2300-6579  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:167-174 
856 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2020-0014/pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0014  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2020-0014/html  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 6  |j 2020  |e 1  |h 167-174 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4240943299 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1830006428 
LOK |0 005 20221223130551 
LOK |0 008 221223||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL