Providence and the Affective Benefits of Natural Causality

Stories of science as an engine of secularization generally assume that scientific ideas and traditional religion are incompatible with each other, such that the advance of the former necessarily means the retreat of the latter. In certain versions of these stories, fear heightens the tension in the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jordan, Peter 1979- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Chicago Press 2022
In: The journal of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 102, Issue: 1, Pages: 27-46
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1832208508
003 DE-627
005 20230125113222.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230125s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1086/717118  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1832208508 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1832208508 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1216840172  |0 (DE-627)1728071224  |4 aut  |a Jordan, Peter  |d 1979- 
109 |a Jordan, Peter 1979-  |a Jordan, Pete 1979-  |a Jordan, Peter N. 1979- 
245 1 0 |a Providence and the Affective Benefits of Natural Causality 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Stories of science as an engine of secularization generally assume that scientific ideas and traditional religion are incompatible with each other, such that the advance of the former necessarily means the retreat of the latter. In certain versions of these stories, fear heightens the tension in the plot by accounting for why religion exists in the first place. This article looks at a range of early modern English thinkers, including Walter Charleton, John Spencer, and Joseph Glanvill, for whom the application of a key feature of science and its historical precursors—the explanation of phenomena through natural causality—is by contrast helpful, because it allows them to battle improper fears within Christianity. Their goal in pursuing naturalistic explanations is not the elimination of fear altogether but rather the elimination of misplaced fears generated by a misunderstanding of how God works in the world. This promotion of some views of God’s activity in nature over others is a consequence of what they perceive to be the affective implications of different versions of the doctrine of providence. Even though these authors may not have imagined the expansion of natural causality’s explanatory scope to lead to secularization, their ideas inadvertently helped to prepare the ground for at least one later instance of it: the secularization of science itself. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of religion  |d Chicago, Ill. : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1921  |g 102(2022), 1, Seite 27-46  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)329085689  |w (DE-600)2047675-9  |w (DE-576)113710593  |x 1549-6538  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:102  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:27-46 
856 |u https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:c176d8f4-939c-4b92-aced-778278777b45/files/r2z10wq47n  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1086/717118  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4251302451 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1832208508 
LOK |0 005 20230125104019 
LOK |0 008 230125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL