The Application of the "Pragmatic Maxim" in Jewish Tradition: The Case of Rabbi Ḥayyim Hirschensohn

This article suggests that certain interpretive trajectories within Jewish tradition—both halakhic (nomos) and aggadic (narrative)—can be illuminated vis-à-vis classical American pragmatism (CAP). Contrary to a prevalent belief, Peirce, James, and Dewey were neither antimetaphysical nor antitraditio...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Berman, Nadav S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Chicago Press 2022
In: The journal of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 102, Issue: 4, Pages: 441-481
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1832437701
003 DE-627
005 20230125155653.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230125s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1086/721294  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1832437701 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1832437701 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Berman, Nadav S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Berman, Nadav S. 
245 1 4 |a The Application of the "Pragmatic Maxim" in Jewish Tradition: The Case of Rabbi Ḥayyim Hirschensohn 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article suggests that certain interpretive trajectories within Jewish tradition—both halakhic (nomos) and aggadic (narrative)—can be illuminated vis-à-vis classical American pragmatism (CAP). Contrary to a prevalent belief, Peirce, James, and Dewey were neither antimetaphysical nor antitraditional. They contended, in different ways, that the "Pragmatic Maxim" (PM)—"truth is what works" in James’s phrasing—is not a narrowly instrumentalist truth test. The PM rather implies that ideas and beliefs (philosophical and religious alike) should be examined against their worldly consequences. After a clarification of this relational maxim in its pragmatist philosophical context, and an introductory sketch of the appearances of the PM in Jewish tradition, the article examines the PM within the thought of Rabbi Ḥayyim Hirschensohn (RḤH; 1857-1935). The article runs as follows: Section I presents CAP and clarifies what the PM is. Section II offers a bird’s-eye mapping of the application of the PM within Jewish tradition. Section III briefs RḤH’s intellectual biography and elaborates on his pragmatist premises and his application of the PM. Rather than conceiving divine commandments as an arbitrary dictate, RḤH viewed them as covenantal, namely, as purposive, relational, and constituted and reaffirmed by individual and collective human agreements. Finally, the article reflects on the theological-intellectual prerequisites for the application of the PM. 
601 |a Pragmatik 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of religion  |d Chicago, Ill. : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1921  |g 102(2022), 4, Seite 441-481  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)329085689  |w (DE-600)2047675-9  |w (DE-576)113710593  |x 1549-6538  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:102  |g year:2022  |g number:4  |g pages:441-481 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1086/721294  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4251564359 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1832437701 
LOK |0 005 20230125155653 
LOK |0 008 230125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL