Principled Engagement in China
In recent years, those who debate U.S. policy towards China have divided themselves into two main camps, those who favor "containment" of China, and those who favor "engagement." The most effective approach lies somewhere in between; "principled engagement" involves pro...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2003
|
| In: |
The review of faith & international affairs
Year: 2003, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-30 |
| Further subjects: | B
Economics
B Human Rights B East Asia B Religious Freedom |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In recent years, those who debate U.S. policy towards China have divided themselves into two main camps, those who favor "containment" of China, and those who favor "engagement." The most effective approach lies somewhere in between; "principled engagement" involves promoting China's good behavior both domestically and internationally, while holding its government accountable for bad behavior. China has made significant advances in terms of human rights in the past few decades, and imposing economic sanctions on the nation would negatively affect Chinese workers and Christian entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs hold increasing promise as agents of positive change on human rights. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1931-7743 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The review of faith & international affairs
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/15435725.2003.9523151 |