The right to a second opinion on Artificial Intelligence diagnosis—Remedying the inadequacy of a risk-based regulation

In this paper, we argue that patients who are subjects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-supported diagnosis and treatment planning should have a right to a second opinion, but also that this right should not necessarily be construed as a right to a physician opinion. The right to a second opinion cou...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Ploug, Thomas (Author) ; Holm, Søren 1901-1971 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2023
In: Bioethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 37, Issue: 3, Pages: 303-311
RelBib Classification:NCH Medical ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
XA Law
Further subjects:B AI regulation
B AI rights
B Artificial Intelligence
B second opinion
B AI risks
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1836297084
003 DE-627
005 20230418211802.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230216s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.13124  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1836297084 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1836297084 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ploug, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The right to a second opinion on Artificial Intelligence diagnosis—Remedying the inadequacy of a risk-based regulation 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper, we argue that patients who are subjects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-supported diagnosis and treatment planning should have a right to a second opinion, but also that this right should not necessarily be construed as a right to a physician opinion. The right to a second opinion could potentially be satisfied by another independent AI system. Our considerations on the right to second opinion are embedded in the wider debate on different approaches to the regulation of AI, and we conclude the article by providing a number of reasons for preferring a rights-based approach over a risk-based approach. 
650 4 |a second opinion 
650 4 |a Artificial Intelligence 
650 4 |a AI risks 
650 4 |a AI rights 
650 4 |a AI regulation 
652 |a NCH:NCJ:XA 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)101688954  |0 (DE-627)630198322  |0 (DE-576)325227624  |4 aut  |a Holm, Søren  |d 1901-1971 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 37(2023), 3, Seite 303-311  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g pages:303-311 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.13124  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13124  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.13124  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 427271483X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1836297084 
LOK |0 005 20230418211802 
LOK |0 008 230216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-02-15#DC6D1C1B21DF724CA4AB110476659738A455C060 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053798  |a XA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL