Building Receptivity: Leopold’s Land Ethic and Critical Feminist Interpretation
Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac emphasizes values of receptivity and perceptivity that appear to be mutually reinforcing, critical to an ecological conscience, and cultivatable through concrete and embodied experience. His priorities bear striking similarities to elements of the ethics of care...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2011
|
In: |
Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture
Year: 2011, Volume: 5, Issue: 4, Pages: 491-509 |
Further subjects: | B
receptivity
B Nel Noddings B Ecofeminism B Aldo Leopold B ethics of care |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1837008205 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230217120643.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230217s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/jsrnc.v5i4.491 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1837008205 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1837008205 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1135416486 |0 (DE-627)89036320X |0 (DE-576)489777708 |4 aut |a Norlock, Kathryn J. |d 1969- | |
109 | |a Norlock, Kathryn J. 1969- |a Norlock, Kathryn 1969- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Building Receptivity |b Leopold’s Land Ethic and Critical Feminist Interpretation |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac emphasizes values of receptivity and perceptivity that appear to be mutually reinforcing, critical to an ecological conscience, and cultivatable through concrete and embodied experience. His priorities bear striking similarities to elements of the ethics of care elaborated by feminist philosophers, especially Nel Noddings, who notably recommended receptivity, direct and personal experience, and even shared Leopold’s attentiveness to joy and play as sources of moral motivation. These commonalities are so fundamental that ecofeminists can and should see Leopold as a philosophical ally. The three ecofeminist scholars who have devoted the most concerted attention to Leopold’s work argue that his Land Ethic is not, and does not provide a basis for, an ecofeminist ethic. I dispute the main criticisms of these scholars, and conclude that ecofeminists should attend more often to Leopold’s work, which extends possibilities for excellent praxis. | ||
601 | |a Feminist | ||
601 | |a Interpretation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Aldo Leopold | |
650 | 4 | |a Nel Noddings | |
650 | 4 | |a Ecofeminism | |
650 | 4 | |a ethics of care | |
650 | 4 | |a receptivity | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture |d London : Equinox Publ., 2007 |g 5(2011), 4, Seite 491-509 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)549634886 |w (DE-600)2395657-4 |w (DE-576)274589745 |x 1749-4915 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2011 |g number:4 |g pages:491-509 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v5i4.491 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.equinoxpub.com/JSRNC/article/view/10216 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4273879964 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1837008205 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230217115802 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |