Religion: a Solution or a Problem for the Legitimisation of the European Union?

Religion is not a competency of the European Union (EU), but has been more and more an issue on its agenda. The question is to know whether this plays in favour of the legitimisation of a supra- or transnational polity, or represents a further obstacle to it. The central hypothesis discussed here is...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Foret, François (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2009
In: Religion, state & society
Year: 2009, Volume: 37, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 37-50
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837607591
003 DE-627
005 20230227152302.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230227s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09637490802693213  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837607591 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837607591 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Foret, François  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Foret, François 
245 1 0 |a Religion: a Solution or a Problem for the Legitimisation of the European Union? 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Religion is not a competency of the European Union (EU), but has been more and more an issue on its agenda. The question is to know whether this plays in favour of the legitimisation of a supra- or transnational polity, or represents a further obstacle to it. The central hypothesis discussed here is that religion in itself is less a specific problem than a revelator of the EU difficulty in dealing with any normative reference. Several examples may be taken to illustrate this position, as a synthesis of different empirical researches. The ‘Christian heritage’ debate in the constitutional process has offered no key to solve the longstanding quest for a European memory. Through the institutionalisation of religions as privileged partners of European governance, the EU has tried to socialise religious actors and to make them comply with the rules of participative democracy (pluralism, mutual recognition …). Beyond the interactions of the policy game in Brussels, these rules do not always appear as generalised social norms. This is highlighted by the growing interventions of churches to defend their particularisms in the media or by the use of religious references - intimately linked with nationalist ones - to question European integration in old and new member states. However, these controversies on the new place of the sacred in public life tend to follow well-established patterns of political struggles, which is a reason to believe that, to a large extent, God is a ‘business as usual’ for the EU. 
601 |a Religion 
601 |a Problem 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion, state & society  |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1992  |g 37(2009), 1/2, Seite 37-50  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270928073  |w (DE-600)1478007-0  |w (DE-576)097188581  |x 1465-3974  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2009  |g number:1/2  |g pages:37-50 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09637490802693213  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4277345921 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837607591 
LOK |0 005 20230227152302 
LOK |0 008 230227||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL