Erik H. Erikson’s identity theory and the formation of early Christianity

Many scholars have recently maintained that it is difficult if not impossible to postulate the definite parting of the ways between Judaism and Christianity in antiquity. It is argued in this paper that recent criticisms against the ‘parting of the ways’‐model resemble criticisms levelled against th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hakola, Raimo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2009
In: Journal of beliefs and values
Year: 2009, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-15
Further subjects:B Social Identity
B Christianity and Judaism
B Erikson, Erik H
B Identity
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1837727864
003 DE-627
005 20230228135335.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230228s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/13617670902784501  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837727864 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837727864 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hakola, Raimo  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Erik H. Erikson’s identity theory and the formation of early Christianity 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Many scholars have recently maintained that it is difficult if not impossible to postulate the definite parting of the ways between Judaism and Christianity in antiquity. It is argued in this paper that recent criticisms against the ‘parting of the ways’‐model resemble criticisms levelled against the classical identity theory formulated by Erik H. Erikson. His identity theory emphasises the sense of personal sameness and historical continuity. In recent decades, however, it has become common to question whether the notion of unified and consistent self does justice to diverse social realities in which individuals construct their sense of who they are. Furthermore, the developmental stage model claims to be universal and culturally neutral while, as a matter of fact, it is implicitly moralistic and value‐laden. In case of the ‘parting of the ways’‐model it has become clear that the model does not match the evidence showing an intense interaction between various Jewish and Christian communities during the first centuries CE. In addition, it has been claimed that the model is not an unbiased historical account but serves Christian theological interests. Comparing the ‘parting of the ways’‐theory with the Eriksonian identity theory highlights the problems inherent in both theories. It is suggested that psychological and social‐psychological theories arguing for the flexible and dynamic nature of identity construction are best suited to describe the emergence of early Christian identity in relation to Jews and Judaism. 
601 |a Erikson, Erik H. 
650 4 |a Christianity and Judaism 
650 4 |a Erikson, Erik H 
650 4 |a Identity 
650 4 |a Social Identity 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of beliefs and values  |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1980  |g 30(2009), 1, Seite 5-15  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320634914  |w (DE-600)2024386-8  |w (DE-576)094752656  |x 1469-9362  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2009  |g number:1  |g pages:5-15 
856 |u http://hdl.handle.net/10138/217486  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13617670902784501  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4277725333 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837727864 
LOK |0 005 20230228135335 
LOK |0 008 230228||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 28-02-23  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL