AMERICAN HEGEMONY AND ETHICS OF WAR AFTER 9/11 : A Critical Approach to Revisionist Views

The "just war" doctrine posits that wars must be morally justified. It provides conditions that must be satisfied for a war to be justly waged and justly conducted. The doctrine’s core principles are embodied in modern international law, which has imposed a legal restraint on the use of fo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Lee, Eric Yong Joong (Author) ; Nam, Soojin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Dharmaram College 2020
In: Journal of Dharma
Year: 2020, Volume: 45, Issue: 1, Pages: 51-72
Further subjects:B Counterterrorism
B 11, Revisionist View, Global Ethics of War, Just War doctrine / 9
B Revisionist View
B war on terror
B Humanitarian Intervention
B 11 / 9
B Just War
B Global Ethics of War
B Anticipatory Self-defence
B Anticipatory Self-defense
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837815631
003 DE-627
005 20230301111818.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1837815631 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837815631 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lee, Eric Yong Joong  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a AMERICAN HEGEMONY AND ETHICS OF WAR AFTER 9/11 : A Critical Approach to Revisionist Views 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The "just war" doctrine posits that wars must be morally justified. It provides conditions that must be satisfied for a war to be justly waged and justly conducted. The doctrine’s core principles are embodied in modern international law, which has imposed a legal restraint on the use of force by even the most powerful. However, since the September 11th attacks, there has been a concerted effort among some American policymakers to reinterpret the doctrine to justify the War on Terror. Their revisions to the classic doctrine alters the nature and the scope of rules on self-defence, humanitarian interventions as well as war crimes. The paper exposes and critically analyzes the revisionist arguments to show the underlying US-centred unilateralism and exceptionalism. The success of such arguments reveals how the US hegemony has extended to the global ethics on war and how it may effectively obliterate the rights-based moral constraint that the just war theory intended to provide. 
601 |a Hegemonie 
650 4 |a 9/11 
650 4 |a 9/11, Revisionist View, Global Ethics of War, Just War doctrine 
650 4 |a Anticipatory Self-defence 
650 4 |a Anticipatory Self-defense 
650 4 |a Counterterrorism 
650 4 |a Global Ethics of War 
650 4 |a Humanitarian Intervention 
650 4 |a Just War 
650 4 |a Revisionist View 
650 4 |a war on terror 
700 1 |a Nam, Soojin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Dharma  |d Bengaluru : Dharmaram College, 1975  |g 45(2020), 1, Seite 51-72  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1765453895  |w (DE-600)3078855-9  |x 0253-7222  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:51-72 
856 4 0 |u http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/1978  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4281955186 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837815631 
LOK |0 005 20230301111818 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL