A Maqāṣidī approach to contemporary application of the Sharī‘ah

This paper explores how Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah (higher purposes and intents of Islamic law) could contribute to the application of the Sharī‘ah itself in contemporary Muslim societies and to making the appropriate related juridical policies. The soundness of the application of the Shar‘īah and related...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Auda, Jasser (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] 2011
In: Intellectual discourse
Year: 2011, Volume: 19, Issue: 2
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837852782
003 DE-627
005 20230301153812.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1837852782 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837852782 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Auda, Jasser  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Maqāṣidī approach to contemporary application of the Sharī‘ah 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper explores how Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah (higher purposes and intents of Islamic law) could contribute to the application of the Sharī‘ah itself in contemporary Muslim societies and to making the appropriate related juridical policies. The soundness of the application of the Shar‘īah and related policies is subject to the degree of universality and flexibility of the Islamic rulings with changing circumstances, are discussed from various viewpoints in this paper. After a survey of the system of values that Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah represent, three methods are explored: (1) differentiating between scripts that are means (wasā’il) to higher ends and scripts that are ends (ahdāf) in their own right, (2) preferring a multi-dimensional understanding for the conciliation of opposing juridical evidence, instead of reductionist methods such as abrogation (naskh) and elimination (tarjīḥ), and (3) achieving a universality of Sharī‘ah across cultures via the consideration of customs (al-‘urf). A number of examples are provided throughout the paper in order to explain the impact of the proposed methods on contemporary Islamic rulings and juridical policies related to them. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Intellectual discourse  |d Kuala Lumpur : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2005  |g 19(2011), 2  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)634379801  |w (DE-600)2570657-3  |w (DE-576)339263164  |x 2289-5639  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2011  |g number:2 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/id/article/view/231  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4282248114 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837852782 
LOK |0 005 20230301153813 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL