Is the Quality of Life Objectively Evaluable on Naturalism?

This article examines one of the sources of David Benatar’s anti-natalism. This is the view that ‘all procreation is [morally] wrong.’ (Benatar and Wasserman, 2015:12) One of its sources is the claim that each of our lives is objectively bad, hence bad whether we think so or not. The question I will...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vallicella, William F. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sciendo, De Gruyter 2023
In: Perichoresis
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 70-83
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBE Anthropology
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1837853894
003 DE-627
005 20230511122006.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2478/perc-2023-0005  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837853894 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837853894 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1049593464  |0 (DE-627)782362540  |0 (DE-576)186697368  |4 aut  |a Vallicella, William F. 
109 |a Vallicella, William F.  |a Vallicella, William 
245 1 0 |a Is the Quality of Life Objectively Evaluable on Naturalism? 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article examines one of the sources of David Benatar’s anti-natalism. This is the view that ‘all procreation is [morally] wrong.’ (Benatar and Wasserman, 2015:12) One of its sources is the claim that each of our lives is objectively bad, hence bad whether we think so or not. The question I will pose is whether the constraints of metaphysical naturalism allow for an objective devaluation of human life sufficiently negative to justify anti-natalism. My thesis is that metaphysical naturalism does not have the resources to support such a negative evaluation. Metaphysical naturalism is the view that causal reality is exhausted by nature, the space-time system and its contents. The gist of my argument is that the ideal standards relative to which our lives are supposed to be axiologically substandard cannot be merely subjective expressions of our desires and aversions; they must be (i) objectively binding standards that are (ii) objectively possible in the sense of concretely realizable. The realizability condition, however, cannot be satisfied on metaphysical naturalism; ergo, failure to meet these ideal standards cannot show that our lives are objectively bad. 
652 |a AB:NBE:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Perichoresis  |d Warsaw, Poland : Sciendo, De Gruyter, 2003  |g 21(2023), 1, Seite 70-83  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)730279154  |w (DE-600)2691385-9  |w (DE-576)375595902  |x 2284-7308  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2023  |g number:1  |g pages:70-83 
856 |u https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/perc-2023-0005  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2023-0005  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4282251387 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837853894 
LOK |0 005 20230511122006 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL