The Link between Coronavirus and Darwin according to Pervez Hoodbhoy: A Critical Response

This paper provides a critical response to Pervez Hoodbhoy’sarticle that first appeared in Dawn, Pakistan’s leading newspaper in April2020. Hoodbhoy, a well-known physicist in the country and a former associateof the Nobel laureate Abdus Salam, titled the article ‘Corona - Our Debt toDarwin.’ The ar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bakar, Osman (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] 2020
In: Intellectual discourse
Year: 2020, Volume: 28, Issue: 2, Pages: 365-386
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837860858
003 DE-627
005 20230301162821.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1837860858 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837860858 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bakar, Osman  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Link between Coronavirus and Darwin according to Pervez Hoodbhoy: A Critical Response 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper provides a critical response to Pervez Hoodbhoy’sarticle that first appeared in Dawn, Pakistan’s leading newspaper in April2020. Hoodbhoy, a well-known physicist in the country and a former associateof the Nobel laureate Abdus Salam, titled the article ‘Corona - Our Debt toDarwin.’ The article’s main contention is that coronavirus reaffirms the truthof Darwin’s theory of organic evolution by means of natural selection thatemphasises random variation and survival of the fittest as its main tenets.Hoodbhoy fully embraces this theory leading him to adopt a confrontationalideological position against religion. He also contends that Darwin’s naturalselection is the key to unravelling the mysteries of coronavirus and tosuccess in delivering the needed vaccines. This paper seeks to rebut both ofHoodbhoy’s contentions through arguments drawn from several disciplines,especially history and philosophy of science, evolutionary biology, theology,and traditional medicine. It argues that the contentions are premised on twomain assumptions that are weak and questionable. First, Darwinian naturalselection has always been central to evolutionary biology. Second, biology haswell established knowledge about viruses, particularly coronavirus. This papershows that the two assumptions are not supported by contemporary knowledgein biology. It argues that Hoodbhoy’s contentions are more motivated by hissectarian evolutionist ideology than by scientific considerations. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Intellectual discourse  |d Kuala Lumpur : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2005  |g 28(2020), 2, Seite 365-386  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)634379801  |w (DE-600)2570657-3  |w (DE-576)339263164  |x 2289-5639  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2020  |g number:2  |g pages:365-386 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/id/article/view/1651  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4282287977 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837860858 
LOK |0 005 20230301162821 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL