From misprision to travesty. Harold Bloom's use of rabbinic sources

Jewish thought is assigned a privileged place in Harold Bloom’s agonistic theory of literary production and allegedly provides a model for the concepts for which he is best known: the anxiety of influence and creative misprision. Nevertheless, Bloom’s view of rabbinic exegesis as ‘rebellious’ and ‘h...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siegumfeldt, Inge (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Donner Institute 2003
In: Nordisk judaistik
Year: 2003, Volume: 24, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 167-186
Further subjects:B Rabbinic literature; Criticism
B Literary
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1838460314
003 DE-627
005 20230307123439.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230307s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.30752/nj.69605  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1838460314 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1838460314 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Siegumfeldt, Inge  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a From misprision to travesty. Harold Bloom's use of rabbinic sources 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Jewish thought is assigned a privileged place in Harold Bloom’s agonistic theory of literary production and allegedly provides a model for the concepts for which he is best known: the anxiety of influence and creative misprision. Nevertheless, Bloom’s view of rabbinic exegesis as ‘rebellious’ and ‘heretical’ emerges as a travesty. His attempt to ascribe a radical, competitive individualism to what is essentially a body of collective authorship reflects a serious misconception of the nature of rabbinic thought and a scant, ill-informed reading of the sources. What I propose to do here is both descriptive and evaluative: to examine and characterize the ways in which Bloom handles rabbinic sources, and then to step outside the Bloomian circle in order to put his (mis)readings to the tests of standard scholarly inquiry. As we shall see, again and again, the test is failed. It may be that one reason for this is technical, that is, Bloom’s lack of the requisite linguistic and historical knowledge. But beyond the detailed catalogue of elementary scholarly error - a substantial affair, as we shall see - there is another story to be told. It is a story of appropriation and distortion motivated by the impact of one theory (Bloom’s) on another (the rabbinic) with which in reality it has very little in common. 
601 |a Travestie 
601 |a Bloom, Harold 
650 4 |a Literary 
650 4 |a Rabbinic literature; Criticism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nordisk judaistik  |d Åbo : Donner Institute, 2016  |g 24(2003), 1/2, Seite 167-186  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)870166158  |w (DE-600)2871196-8  |w (DE-576)47815240X  |x 2343-4929  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2003  |g number:1/2  |g pages:167-186 
856 |u https://journal.fi/nj/article/download/69605/30991  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.30752/nj.69605  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://journal.fi/nj/article/view/69605  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4284365193 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1838460314 
LOK |0 005 20230307123439 
LOK |0 008 230307||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL